Methods for Phototrophic and Heterotrophic Plankton Taxa Sampling,
Preservation, Enumeration and Biomass Estimation
(Modified from Frame and Lessard, in press)
Biomass of phytoplankton and microzooplankton taxa groups were measured
in the initial samples for dilution experiments off the Washington and
Oregon coasts taken during four RISE cruises 2004-2006.
Replicate samples for phytoplankton and microzooplankton identification,
enumeration, and sizing were preserved with either acid Lugol's (5% final
conc.) or gluteraldehyde (0.5% final conc.). Gluteraldehyde-fixed samples
were stained with DAPI and proflavin, then filtered onto 0.8µm and 0.2µm
black polycarbonate membranes (Lessard and Murrell 1996). Slides were
stored frozen until analysis onshore.
Microscope counts
Known volumes of the Lugols-preserved samples were settled in counting
chambers for enumeration of ciliates (including mixotrophs), diatoms and
larger dinoflagellates. Counts were performed on a Zeiss inverted microscope
at 250x magnification. Glutarldehyde-preserved samples on 0.8µm filters
were examined with a Zeiss standard epifluorescence microscope at 400x
magnification for enumeration of microphytoplankton including photosynthetic
dinoflagellates (typically
raphidophyte. Samples on the 0.2µm filters were examined at 1000x
magnification for cyanobacteria, picoeukaryotes (
and heterotrophic nanoflagellates (>2-10µm).
Biomass estimates
Picoplankton (cyanobacteria and picoeukaryotes) were sized using images
taken with a QImaging Retiga EX charged coupled device (CCD) camera and
Image Pro Plus software. Dimensions of all other cells were measured
using a computer-aided digitizing system (Roff and Hopcroft 1986).
Cell volumes were calculated using appropriate geometric formulas and
carbon was calculated using the carbon to volume equations of Menden-Deuer
and Lessard (2000) for diatoms, nanoplankton and dinoflagellates, and of
Worden et al. (2004) for picoplankton. Ciliate carbon was estimated using
the conversion from Putt and Stoecker (1989).
References for further details:
Lessard, E.J. and M.C. Murrell (1996), Distribution, abundance and size composition
of heterotrophic dinoflagellates and ciliates in the Sargasso Sea near Bermuda,
Deep Sea Research Part I, 43(7), 1045-1065.
Frame, E.R. Frame and E.J. Lessard. Does the Columbia River Plume influence phytoplankton
community structure along the Washington and Oregon coasts? In press. J. Geophysical Res.
Menden-Deuer, S., and E. J. Lessard (2000), Carbon to volume relationships for
dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 45, 569-579.
Putt, M., and D. K. Stoecker. 1989. An experimentally determined carbon:volume ratio
for marine "oligotrichous" ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 34: 1097-1103.
Roff, J. C. and R. R. Hopcroft (1986), High precision microcomputer based measuring
system for ecological research, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 43, 2044-2048.
Worden, A.Z., J.K. Nolan, and B. Palenik (2004), Assessing the dynamics and ecology
of marine picophytoplankton: the importance of the eukaryotic component,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 49(1), 168-179.