“Happy Holidays! BCO-DMO will be on break from 23 December to 2 January 2025. Submissions and questions will still be accepted, however our responses may be delayed during this time.”

Dataset: CTD - Bottles - OC449-03
Deployment: OC449-03

CTD - Bottles - OC449-03
Principal Investigator: 
Phoebe J. Lam (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI)
Contact: 
Phoebe J. Lam (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI)
BCO-DMO Data Manager: 
Stephen R. Gegg (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI BCO-DMO)
Current State: 
Preliminary and in progress
Version: 
13 October 2011
Deployment Synonyms:
 SIRENA
Version Date: 
2011-10-13
Description
CTD Bottle Data - avg, stdev,min and max values at bottle firings for various parameters
 
PI's Note/09May2011:
In comparing my pump seacat CTD to the ship's CTD, I've discovered that the ship's CTD's fluorescence and beam attenuation are no good, at least for OC449-3. The ship's fluorometer was clearly just not working.  The ship's transmissometer misbehaved in a more subtle manner--oceanographically consistent, but of a different pattern than my pump seacat data.  I concluded that my pump seacat CTD's transmissometer is the "correct" one by comparing to discrete particulate carbon measurements on particles collected on my pumps.  Both particulate carbon concentrations and beam attenuation from my pump seacat CTD show a minimum at 500m at OC449-3 station 3, whereas the ship's CTD shows an anomalous minimum in subsurface beam attenuation at station 2, which is not seem in the particulate carbon concentrations.
 
More information about this dataset deployment