Blank calculation:
At sea, the blank calculation of the data was made using the value derived from a sample that had been spiked with EDTA. This process yields a sample that should have no uncomplexed Fe thus allowing subtraction of the system blank.
Shore based adjustment of the shipboard data was made by comparison with the shore-based ICP MS data measured by J. Wu at U Miami. A plot of each station's data (FIA vs ICP MS) yielded a slope and intercept that was then used to recalculate the shipboard data. This indicated that the shipboard blank correction was underestimating the system blank.
Table: Slope and intercept between shipboard FIA (substituted EDTA blank) and ICPMS data
Station Slope Intercept R2
USGT10-01 0.930 0.635 0.670
USGT10-03 0.644 0.316 0.868
USGT10-05 0.807 0.383 0.908
USGT10-06 0.930 0.112 0.910
USGT10-07 0.930 0.112 0.910
USGT10-09 1.183 0.051 0.909
USGT10-10 1.208 0.057 0.857
USGT10-11 1.150 0.091 0.863
USGT10-12 1.281 0.191 0.947
The ICPMS data reported by Miami (Dr. Wu) were only for full depth stations. One of the demi stations were determined at sea on the same day that full depth stations were run specifically GT10-06 and GT 10-07. Thus, these samples were adjusted using the same slope and intercept used for the full depth station. However, the other demi station samples were determined on separate days. Thus, the samples cannot currently be adjusted with existing ICPMS data.
The following demi stations have not been adjusted and are not reported: USGT10-02, USGT10-08.
Quality flags
Data have been flagged using the WOCE system of flags. Good is 2. Questionable is 3. Bad is 4. Samples that appear to be contaminated have been flagged 3.
Determination of contamination was by agreement with ICP MS data after adjustment (see above).
For dissolved Fe, samples in which both the ICP MS and the FIA data appear to be bad (not oceanographically consistent) have been flagged 4.
Flagged data from GT10 (2010 cruise):
Total reported sample count: 211
Flag 2 (Good): 175
Flag 3 (Questionable): 49
Flag 4 (Bad): 7
Accuracy results:
There are no shipboard results for the recoveries of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) or consensus reference materials (e.g., SAFe water) as these samples are too acid to be run using this protocol. Instead these data are corrected using the shore-based ICP MS values which are calibrated against SaFe samples.
BCO-DMO Processing Notes
- Parameter names were modified to conform with BCO-DMO conventions.
- '-999' values were replaced with 'nd' to indicate 'no data'.
- The 'lon' parameter was calculated using the 'lon_360' values provided in the original data submission. (lon = lon_360 - 360).
- Original data submission received on 12/18/12 was replaced with updated data received on 12/21/12, in which a small error and quality flags have been corrected.
- Dataset updated to new version on 22 May 2013.
- The dataset was again updated to a newer version (including updates and error fixes) on 14 October 2013 (most recent version).
Additional GEOTRACES Processing:
After the data were submitted to the International Data Management Office, BODC, the office noticed that important identifying information was missing in many datasets. With the agreement of BODC and the US GEOTRACES lead PIs, BCO-DMO added standard US GEOTRACES information, such as the US GEOTRACES event number, to each submitted dataset lacking this information. To accomplish this, BCO-DMO compiled a 'master' dataset composed of the following parameters: station_GEOTRC, cast_GEOTRC (bottle and pump data only), event_GEOTRC, sample_GEOTRC, sample_bottle_GEOTRC (bottle data only), bottle_GEOTRC (bottle data only), depth_GEOTRC_CTD (bottle data only), depth_GEOTRC_CTD_rounded (bottle data only), BTL_ISO_DateTime_UTC (bottle data only), and GeoFish_id (GeoFish data only). This added information will facilitate subsequent analysis and inter comparison of the datasets.
Bottle parameters in the master file were taken from the GT-C_Bottle_GT10, GT-C_Bottle_GT11, ODF_Bottle_GT10, and ODF_Bottle_GT11 datasets. Non-bottle parameters, including those from GeoFish tows, Aerosol sampling, and McLane Pumps, were taken from the Event_Log_GT10 and Event_Log_GT11 datasets. McLane pump cast numbers missing in event logs were taken from the Particulate Th-234 dataset submitted by Ken Buesseler.
A standardized BCO-DMO method (called "join") was then used to merge the missing parameters to each US GEOTRACES dataset, most often by matching on sample_GEOTRC or on some unique combination of other parameters.
If the master parameters were included in the original data file and the values did not differ from the master file, the original data columns were retained and the names of the parameters were changed from the PI-submitted names to the standardized master names. If there were differences between the PI-supplied parameter values and those in the master file, both columns were retained. If the original data submission included all of the master parameters, no additional columns were added, but parameter names were modified to match the naming conventions of the master file.
See the dataset parameters documentation for a description of which parameters were supplied by the PI and which were added via the join method.