Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Gardner, Wilford D. | Texas A&M University (TAMU) | Principal Investigator |
Morrison, John M. | North Carolina State University - Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences (NCSU MEAS) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Chandler, Cynthia L. | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gundersen (Texas A&M University) John Morrison (North Carolina University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: January 08, 1995 to December 26, 1995 location: N: 22.5 S: 10 W: 57.3 E: 68.75 project/cruise: Arabian Sea - All Process Cruises ship: Thomas Thompson Wilford Gardner - based on temperature changes John Morrison - based on density changes Arabian Sea Mixed Layer Depths - all process cruises PI Notes PI Notes on density vs. temperature calculation Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146
Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical.
See Platform deployments for cruise specific documentation
File |
---|
mixed_layer.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 48.85 KB) MD5:e40cdd6446d8c6984abdba716ba6f662 Primary data file for dataset ID 2530 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
event | event number, from event log | |
sta_std | Arabian Sea standard station identifier | |
sta | station number | |
cast | CTD cast number | |
MLD_0d1_t | depth of mixed layer based on a .1 deg. C change in temperature | meters |
MLD_0d5_t | depth of mixed layer based on a .5 deg. C change in temperature | meters |
depth_start_temp | starting depth used in computation based on temperature | meters |
MLD_0d03_dp | depth of mixed layer based on a .03kg/m^3 change in density | decibars |
MLD_0d05_dp | depth of mixed layer based on a .05kg/m^3 change in density | decibars |
MLD_0d125_dp | depth of mixed layer based on a .125kg/m^3 change in density | decibars |
LD_0d25_dp | depth of mixed layer based on a .25kg/m^3 change in density | decibars |
depth_start_dens | starting depth used in computation based on density | decibars |
MLD_0d25_dp | depth of mixed layer based on a .25kg/m^3 change in density | decibars |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Conductivity, Temperature, Depth |
Generic Instrument Name | CTD - profiler |
Dataset-specific Description | CTD measurements taken, CTD unit unidentified |
Generic Instrument Description | The Conductivity, Temperature, Depth (CTD) unit is an integrated instrument package designed to measure the conductivity, temperature, and pressure (depth) of the water column. The instrument is lowered via cable through the water column. It permits scientists to observe the physical properties in real-time via a conducting cable, which is typically connected to a CTD to a deck unit and computer on a ship. The CTD is often configured with additional optional sensors including fluorometers, transmissometers and/or radiometers. It is often combined with a Rosette of water sampling bottles (e.g. Niskin, GO-FLO) for collecting discrete water samples during the cast.
This term applies to profiling CTDs. For fixed CTDs, see https://www.bco-dmo.org/instrument/869934. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Report | |
Start Date | 1995-01-08 |
End Date | 1995-02-05 |
Description | Purpose: Process Cruise #1 (Late NE Monsoon) Methods & Sampling PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gunderson (Texas A&M University) and John Morrison (North Carolina State University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: January 08, 1995 to February 01, 1995 location: N: 22.483 S: 9.9826 W: 57.2999 E: 68.75 project/cruise: Arabian Sea Process Cruise 1, TTN-043 (Late NE Monsoon) ship: Thomas Thompson Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146 From Wilf Gardner, Texas A & M University, August 8, 1997 to Arabian Sea investigators and all interested others Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Start Date | 1995-03-14 |
End Date | 1995-04-10 |
Description | Methods & Sampling PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gunderson (Texas A&M University) and John Morrison (North Carolina State University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: January 08, 1995 to February 01, 1995 location: N: 22.483 S: 9.9826 W: 57.2999 E: 68.75 project/cruise: Arabian Sea Process Cruise 2, TTN-045 (Spring InterMonsoon) ship: Thomas Thompson Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146 From Wilf Gardner, Texas A & M University, August 8, 1997 to Arabian Sea investigators and all interested others Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Start Date | 1995-07-17 |
End Date | 1995-08-15 |
Description | Methods & Sampling PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gundersen-temperature-based (Texas A&M University) and John Morrison-density-based (North Carolina State University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: July 18, 1995 to August 13, 1995 location: N: 22.5268 S: 9.911 W: 57.2997 E: 68.7507 project/cruise: Arabian Sea Process Cruise 4, TTN-049 (Middle SW Monsoon) ship: Thomas Thompson Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146 From Wilf Gardner, Texas A & M University, August 8, 1997 to Arabian Sea investigators and all interested others Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Start Date | 1995-08-18 |
End Date | 1995-09-15 |
Description | Methods & Sampling PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gundersen-temperature-based (Texas A&M University) and John Morrison-density-based (North Carolina State University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: August 18, 1995 to September 13, 1995 location: N: 22.4998 S: 9.9125 W: 57.3004 E: 68.7527 project/cruise: Arabian Sea Process Cruise 5, TTN-050 (Late SW Monsoon) ship: Thomas Thompson Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146 From Wilf Gardner, Texas A & M University, August 8, 1997 to Arabian Sea investigators and all interested others Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Start Date | 1995-10-29 |
End Date | 1995-11-26 |
Description | Methods & Sampling PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gundersen-temperature-based (Texas A&M University) and John Morrison-density-based (North Carolina State University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: October 29, 1995 to November 25, 1995 location: N: 24.3329 S: 10.0823 W: 56.4858 E: 67.1784 project/cruise: Arabian Sea Process Cruise 6, TTN-053 (bio-optics) ship: Thomas Thompson Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146 From Wilf Gardner, Texas A & M University, August 8, 1997 to Arabian Sea investigators and all interested others Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Thomas G. Thompson |
Start Date | 1995-11-30 |
End Date | 1995-12-28 |
Description | Methods & Sampling PI: Wilford Gardner (Texas A&M University), Jan Gundersen-temperature-based (Texas A&M University) and John Morrison-density-based (North Carolina State University) dataset: Mixed layer depths dates: November 30, 1995 to December 26, 1995 location: N: 22.5171 S: 9.9673 W: 57.2992 E: 68.7849 project/cruise: Arabian Sea Process Cruise 7, TTN-054 (Early NE Monsoon) ship: Thomas Thompson Mixed layer depths are based on a temperature increase of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C from the second temperature value listed in the CTD files, which corresponds roughly to a density increase of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. The second TEMPERATURE value was used because there occasionally appeared to be questionable numbers as the first value. The temperature change of 0.1 degree C was recommended by Dr. Craig Lee (WHOI) after looking at the data and the 0.5 degree C value is the Levitus standard used in his NOAA global atlases. These are also the values used in the US JGOFS EqPac program. Please note variable initial (starting) depths. Calculations were made by Jan Gundersen. (TAMU). Wilford D. Gardner Dept. of Oceanography Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3146 From Wilf Gardner, Texas A & M University, August 8, 1997 to Arabian Sea investigators and all interested others Since the New Hampshire meeting [July, 1997], we have compared the MLD based on the temperature criteria of 0.1 and 0.5 degrees C compared with the density differences of 0.03 and 0.125 density units. About 75% of the time the values are identical. There are other occasions, however, where there are significant differences, especially for the 0.1 degrees C/0.03 comparison. When there is a difference, the temperature calculations generally give deeper MLDs than density calculations. Differences most often occur when there is a salinity increase below the surface. Temperature criteria are often used for MLDs on moored data as salinity sensors are sometimes subject to greater drift than temperature sensors. None of the above criteria identify the "mixed-layer depth" perfectly in all cases, but examination of depth plots where there are differences suggest that the density criteria more reliably identify the depth of most recent mixing. For consistency, we recommend that the MLDs based on density be used when you are trying to calculate mass budgets. In some situations, such as sometimes during the TN045 intermonsoon period, there is no true mixed layer - just a depth at which the MLD criteria are finally exceeded. We suggest that you look at an expanded plot of the density profile if your calculations are critical. |
The U.S. Arabian Sea Expedition which began in September 1994 and ended in January 1996, had three major components: a U.S. JGOFS Process Study, supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF); Forced Upper Ocean Dynamics, an Office of Naval Research (ONR) initiative; and shipboard and aircraft measurements supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Expedition consisted of 17 cruises aboard the R/V Thomas Thompson, year-long moored deployments of five instrumented surface buoys and five sediment-trap arrays, aircraft overflights and satellite observations. Of the seventeen ship cruises, six were allocated to repeat process survey cruises, four to SeaSoar mapping cruises, six to mooring and benthic work, and a single calibration cruise which was essentially conducted in transit to the Arabian Sea.
The United States Joint Global Ocean Flux Study was a national component of international JGOFS and an integral part of global climate change research.
The U.S. launched the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) in the late 1980s to study the ocean carbon cycle. An ambitious goal was set to understand the controls on the concentrations and fluxes of carbon and associated nutrients in the ocean. A new field of ocean biogeochemistry emerged with an emphasis on quality measurements of carbon system parameters and interdisciplinary field studies of the biological, chemical and physical process which control the ocean carbon cycle. As we studied ocean biogeochemistry, we learned that our simple views of carbon uptake and transport were severely limited, and a new "wave" of ocean science was born. U.S. JGOFS has been supported primarily by the U.S. National Science Foundation in collaboration with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Energy and the Office of Naval Research. U.S. JGOFS, ended in 2005 with the conclusion of the Synthesis and Modeling Project (SMP).
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
Office of Naval Research (ONR) | |
National Science Foundation (NSF) |