Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Tsuda, Atsushi | Ocean Research Institute - University of Tokyo (ORI) | Principal Investigator |
Mackie, Doug | University of Otago | Contact |
Gegg, Stephen R. | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
SEEDS 2004 CTD Sampling Log
CTD Station Locations and Samples Taken at Each Station
The first iron addition was carried out from 0:50 GMT on 20 July to 0:00 GMT on 21 July (GMT).
Day 1 was defined as 21 July (GMT).
This worksheet describes samples taken at each CTD station
Prepared by Doug Mackie, August 2008
xl tab number refers to the numbering system used in the accompanying word file
column headings are fully explained in the accompanying word file
BCO-DMO/Doug Mackie Note:
Throughout these data, stations are identified as D2-I, D2-O, etc.
D2-I indicates "Day 2, in patch station".
while D2-O indicates "Day 2, out patch station".
BCO-DMO Processing Notes
CSV file generated from original spreadsheet SEEDS_II_CTD_rosette_samples.xls by Doug Mackie
BCO-DMO Edits
- X (no sample) replaced with ns
- xl tab number prepended to corresponding parameter name
- Parameter names modified to conform to BCO-DMO convention
- Patch variable added to indicate pre/In/Out of Patch
File |
---|
CTD_Sampling.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 8.64 KB) MD5:94ece1ba436ef347160816d75e10724e Primary data file for dataset ID 3159 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
station | Station id | text |
date | Station date (GMT) | YYYYMMDD |
time | Station time (GMT) | HHMM |
lon | Station longitude (West is negative) | decimal degrees |
lat | Station latitude (South is negative) | decimal degrees |
Patch | Station location relative to the Patch (In; Out; Pre) | text |
xl_05_DO | Sample status for xl_05_DO | text |
xl_06_NUTS | Sample status for xl_06_NUTS | text |
xl_07_CHL_a | Sample status for xl_07_CHL_a | text |
xl_08_zooplank | Sample status for xl_08_zooplank | text |
xl_09_Sal | Sample status for xl_09_Sal | text |
xl_10_snow | Sample status for xl_10_snow | text |
xl_11_POC_to_N | Sample status for xl_11_POC_to_N | text |
xl_12_P_Si | Sample status for xl_12_P_Si | text |
xl_13_P_13C | Sample status for xl_13_P_13C | text |
xl_14_P_Ca | Sample status for xl_14_P_Ca | text |
xl_15_Phyt_taxn | Sample status for xl_15_Phyt_taxn | text |
xl_16_HNF | Sample status for xl_16_HNF | text |
xl_17_Virus_infect | Sample status for xl_17_Virus_infect | text |
xl_18_Chl_size | Sample status for xl_18_Chl_size | text |
xl_19_13C_prodn | Sample status for xl_19_13C_prodn | text |
xl_20_15N_uptake | Sample status for xl_20_15N_uptake | text |
xl_21_Bacterial_production | Sample status for xl_21_Bacterial_production | text |
xl_22_DOM | Sample status for xl_22_DOM | text |
xl_23_DMS_DMSP | Sample status for xl_23_DMS_DMSP | text |
xl_24_DMS_prodn | Sample status for xl_24_DMS_prodn | text |
xl_25_Ra_Th_P_Be | Sample status for xl_25_Ra_Th_P_Be | text |
xl_26_PUV | Sample status for xl_26_PUV | text |
xl_27_PRR | Sample status for xl_27_PRR | text |
xl_28_Susp_part | Sample status for xl_28_Susp_part | text |
xl_29_SF6 | Sample status for xl_29_SF6 | text |
xl_30_HPLC_pigment | Sample status for xl_30_HPLC_pigment | text |
xl_31_microzoo | Sample status for xl_31_microzoo | text |
xl_32_FCM_bacteria | Sample status for xl_32_FCM_bacteria | text |
xl_33_FRRF | Sample status for xl_33_FRRF | text |
xl_34_Proteins | Sample status for xl_34_Proteins | text |
xl_35_algal_cell_viability | Sample status for xl_35_algal_cell_viability | text |
xl_36_13C_PE | Sample status for xl_36_13C_PE | text |
xl_37_a_star | Sample status for xl_37_a_star | text |
xl_38_Particulate_P | Sample status for xl_38_Particulate_P | text |
xl_39_TEP | Sample status for xl_39_TEP | text |
xl_40_FCM_phyto | Sample status for xl_40_FCM_phyto | text |
xl_41_CH4 | Sample status for xl_41_CH4 | text |
xl_42_NO | Sample status for xl_42_NO | text |
xl_43_CO | Sample status for xl_43_CO | text |
xl_44_NMHC | Sample status for xl_44_NMHC | text |
xl_45_dilution | Sample status for xl_45_dilution | text |
xl_46_DIC_alk | Sample status for xl_46_DIC_alk | text |
xl_47_T_D_FE | Sample status for xl_47_T_D_FE | text |
xl_48_soluble_Fe | Sample status for xl_48_soluble_Fe | text |
xl_49_Fe_solubility | Sample status for xl_49_Fe_solubility | text |
xl_50_Fe_to_C_ratio | Sample status for xl_50_Fe_to_C_ratio | text |
xl_51_trace_metals | Sample status for xl_51_trace_metals | text |
xl_52_REE | Sample status for xl_52_REE | text |
xl_53_T_D_Po_Pb | Sample status for xl_53_T_D_Po_Pb | text |
xl_54_dissolved_Fe_L | Sample status for xl_54_dissolved_Fe_L | text |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Hakuho Maru |
Start Date | 2004-07-09 |
End Date | 2004-08-02 |
Description | Tsuda, A., et al. (2007): Evidence for the grazing hypothesis: Grazing reduces phytoplankton responses of the HNLC ecosystem to iron enrichment in the western subarctic pacific (SEEDS II).
J. Oceanogr. 63(6), 983-994.
The first iron addition was carried out from 0:50 GMT on 20 July to 0:00 GMT on 21 July (GMT).
Day 1 was defined as 21 July (GMT).
The ship started to inject iron and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) as an inert tracer of the water mass, executing an 8 km by 8 km grid pattern centered on the buoy with an interval of 400 m. The ship was navigated with a lagrangian coordination system (Tsumune et al., 2005), and buoy position was transmitted to the ship every 10 min to update the navigation frame of reference to account for surface water advection. The amount of iron added to the patch was 332 kg Fe as FeSO4. During the iron fertilization, 4000 L of saturated SF6 solution was also simultaneously injected. The saturated SF6 solution was made onboard using the method previously detailed in Tsumune et al. (2005). Note that the saturated SF6 concentration in seawater is about 0.2 mM (Ledwell and Watson, 1991). A second iron addition was performed on day 6 without SF6 tracer, when an additional 159 kg of iron was added to the patch, which was traced using the SF6 signal. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Hakuho Maru |
Start Date | 2004-08-06 |
End Date | 2004-08-25 |
Description | Tsuda, A., et al. (2007): Evidence for the grazing hypothesis: Grazing reduces phytoplankton responses of the HNLC ecosystem to iron enrichment in the western subarctic pacific (SEEDS II). J. Oceanogr. 63(6), 983-994.
The first iron addition was carried out from 0:50 GMT on 20 July to 0:00 GMT on 21 July (GMT). Day 1 was defined as 21 July (GMT).
The ship started to inject iron and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) as an inert tracer of the water mass, executing an 8 km by 8 km grid pattern centered on the buoy with an interval of 400 m. The ship was navigated with a lagrangian coordination system (Tsumune et al., 2005), and buoy position was transmitted to the ship every 10 min to update the navigation frame of reference to account for surface water advection. The amount of iron added to the patch was 332 kg Fe as FeSO4. During the iron fertilization, 4000 L of saturated SF6 solution was also simultaneously injected. The saturated SF6 solution was made onboard using the method previously detailed in Tsumune et al. (2005). Note that the saturated SF6 concentration in seawater is about 0.2 mM (Ledwell and Watson, 1991). A second iron addition was performed on day 6 without SF6 tracer, when an additional 159 kg of iron was added to the patch, which was traced using the SF6 signal. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Kilo Moana |
Start Date | 2004-07-15 |
End Date | 2004-08-25 |
Description | Cruise information and original data are available from the NSF R2R data catalog. |
As at August 2008 the Tsuda 2007 paper is the only one to carry a general description.
The first iron addition was carried out from 0:50 GMT on 20 July to 0:00 GMT on 21 July (GMT). Day 1 was defined as 21 July (GMT).
Tsuda, A., et al. (2007): Evidence for the grazing hypothesis: Grazing reduces phytoplankton responses of the HNLC ecosystem to iron enrichment in the western subarctic pacific (SEEDS II). J. Oceanogr. 63(6), 983-994.
A mesoscale iron-enrichment study (SEEDS II) was carried out in the western subarctic Pacific in the summer of 2004. The iron patch was traced for 26 days, which included observations of the development and the decline of the bloom by mapping with sulfur hexafluoride. The experiment was conducted at almost the same location and the same season as SEEDS (previous iron- enrichment experiment). However, the results were very different between SEEDS and SEEDS II. A high accumulation of phytoplankton biomass (~18 mg chl m-3) was characteristic of SEEDS. In contrast, in SEEDS II, the surface chlorophyll-a accumulation was lower, 0.8 to 2.48 mg m-3, with no prominent diatom bloom. Photosynthetic competence in terms of Fv/Fm for the total phytoplankton community in the surface waters increased after the iron enrichments and returned to the ambient level by day 20. These results suggest that the photosynthetic physiology of the phytoplankton assemblage was improved by the iron enrichments and returned to an iron-stressed condition during the declining phase of the bloom. Pico-phytoplankton (<2 um) became dominant in the chlorophyll-a size distribution after the bloom.
We observed a nitrate drawdown of 3.8 uM in the patch (day 21), but there was no difference in silicic acid concentration between inside and outside the patch. Mesozooplankton (copepod) biomass was three to five times higher during the bloom-development phase in SEEDS II than in SEEDS. The copepod biomass increased exponentially. The grazing rate estimation indicates that the copepod grazing prevented the formation of an extensive diatom bloom, which was observed in SEEDS, and led to the change to a pico- phytoplankton dominated community towards the end of the experiment.
SEEDS II was conduced in the same western subarctic Pacific region as the initial SEEDS experiment, and was an international collaborative study utilizing two research vessels (R.V. Hakuho Maru and R.V. Kilo Moana). This experiment was designed to characterize the evolution of the fertilized patch over a longer time scale (1 month) and with a greater range of parameters than measured during SEEDS.
The preliminary results from SEEDS II showed both the iron-induced increase and subsequent decline in phytoplankton biomass. However, the iron-initiated bloom was much less intense than observed in SEEDS. Chlorophyll-a concentrations increased only 2 to 3 times over initial values, and the drawdown of nutrients and pCO2 were small.
SEEDS II Project Documentation
SEEDS II Workshop Summary
The two main objectives of the Iron Synthesis program (SCOR Working Group proposal, 2005), are:
1. Data compilation: assembling a common open-access database of the in situ iron experiments, beginning with the first period (1993-2002; Ironex-1, Ironex-2, SOIREE, EisenEx, SEEDS-1; SOFeX, SERIES) where primary articles have already been published, to be followed by the 2004 experiments where primary articles are now in progress (EIFEX, SEEDS-2; SAGE, FeeP); similarly for the natural fertilizations S.O.JGOFS (1992), CROZEX (2004/2005) and KEOPS (2005).
2. Modeling and data synthesis of specific aspects of two or more such experiments for various topics such as physical mixing, phytoplankton productivity, overall ecosystem functioning, iron chemistry, CO2 budgeting, nutrient uptake ratios, DMS(P) processes, and combinations of these variables and processes.
SCOR Working Group proposal, 2005. "The Legacy of in situ Iron Enrichments: Data Compilation and Modeling".
http://www.scor-int.org/Working_Groups/wg131.htm
See also: SCOR Proceedings Vol. 42 Concepcion, Chile October 2006, pgs: 13-16 2.3.3 Working Group on The Legacy of in situ Iron Enrichments: Data Compilation and Modeling.
The first objective of the Iron Synthesis program involves a data recovery effort aimed at assembling a common, open-access database of data and metadata from a series of in-situ ocean iron fertilization experiments conducted between 1993 and 2005. Initially, funding for this effort is being provided by the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF).
Through the combined efforts of the principal investigators of the individual projects and the staff of Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO), data currently available primarily through individuals, disparate reports and data agencies, and in multiple formats, are being collected and prepared for addition to the BCO-DMO database from which they will be freely available to the community.
As data are contributed to the BCO-DMO office, they are organized into four overlapping categories:
1. Level 1, basic metadata
(e.g., description of project/study, general location, PI(s), participants);
2. Level 2, detailed metadata and basic shipboard data and routine ship's operations
(e.g., CTDs, underway measurements, sampling event logs);
3. Level 3, detailed metadata and data from specialized observations
(e.g., discrete observations, experimental results, rate measurements) and
4. Level 4, remaining datasets
(e.g., highest level of detailed data available from each study).
Collaboration with BCO-DMO staff began in March of 2008 and initial efforts have been directed toward basic project descriptions, levels 1 and 2 metadata and basic data, with detailed and more detailed data files being incorporated as they become available and are processed.
The Iron Synthesis Program is funded jointly by the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) and the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF).