Particulate data collected on R/V Melville (MV1405, IrnBru) along the California coast in July 2014

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/663183
Data Type: Cruise Results
Version: 1
Version Date: 2016-10-26

Project
» Collaborative Research: Investigating the Ecological Importance of Iron Storage in Diatoms (Diatom Iron Storage)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Twining, BenjaminBigelow Laboratory for Ocean SciencesPrincipal Investigator
Rauschenberg, SaraBigelow Laboratory for Ocean SciencesContact
Ake, HannahWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
This dataset includes trace element concentrations in particles collected with GO-Flo bottles on R/V Melville (MV1405, IrnBru) along the California coast in July 2014.


Coverage

Spatial Extent: N:42.866 E:-120.03 S:34.23 W:-126.75
Temporal Extent: 2014-07-06 - 2014-07-25

Dataset Description

Trace element concentrations in particles collected with GO-Flo bottles and analyzed with inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Concentrations of labile, refractory, and total metal fractions are reported.


Methods & Sampling

Total, refractory, and labile particulate element concentrations via ICPMS:
Labile and total suspended particulate trace elements concentrations are reported for: Al, Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, La, Mn, Ni, P, Pb, Sc, Th, Ti, V, Y, Zn. Concentrations of the labile fraction of these particulate elements are indicated as element names followed by the suffix ‘-Labile’, refractory portions are indicated with the suffix ‘-Refractory’, and concentrations of total particulate elements (the sum of labile and refractory) are followed by ‘-Total’. Concentrations are reported in units of picomoles per liter (pmol/L).

Sampling Methodology:
Trace metal-clean seawater samples were collected using a sampling system consisting of Teflon-coated GO-Flo bottles and following methods described in Bruland et al (1979). Additional samples were collected from surface waters (~2 meters) using a towed ‘fish’ deployed by Ken Bruland's lab. Water collected with GO-Flo bottles and the ‘fish’ was transferred into acid-washed 4-liter (L) LDPE carboys for off-line filtration.

All filtration was conducted in a HEPA-filtered 'bubble' (temporary clean room). A filter holder containing a 25-millimeter (mm) diameter Pall Supor 0.4-micrometer (um) polyethersulfone membrane was attached to the opening at the carboy top. Carboys were pressurized with 0.2‐um filtered air and inverted during filtration to ensure that all particles were captured on the membrane. Filtrate was collected to determine the volume of seawater filtered: an average of 2.1L was filtered through each membrane. After filtration, membranes were folded into quarters, placed in 1.7-milliliter (mL) polypropylene vials, and stored at -20 degrees Celsius until analysis.

Analytical Methodology:
All digestion steps were performed in a Class-100 clean room using standard clean techniques. Filters were sequentially digested, first following the protocol of Berger et al. (2008) to obtain labile particulate concentrations and then digested using a 4M HCl, 4M HNO3, and 4M HF mixture as described in Ohnemus et al. (2014) to obtain refractory particulate element concentrations.

For the labile particulate leach, a 1-milliliter solution of 25% Optima-grade acetic acid and 0.02 M hydroxylamine was added to the filter stored in a 1.7 mL polypropylene vial. Following the recommendation of Berger et al. (2008), the solution was heated to 95 degrees C in a water bath for 10 minutes and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The filter was in contact with the acetic acid leach for a total of two hours, after which the filter was removed from the polypropylene vial and placed in an acid-cleaned 22-mL PFA vial. The acetic acid/hydroxylamine leachate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 minutes to sediment all particles. Without disturbing particles on the bottom of the tube, approximately 0.8 mL of leachate was transferred into an acid-cleaned 7 mL PFA digestion vial. Optima-grade HNO3 was added (100 uL) to the digestion vial, which was subsequently heated uncapped at 110 degrees C to near dryness. Vial contents were redissolved with 2% HNO3 (Optima grade).

Refractory particulate metals were determined by subsequent digestion of the filter. Two milliliters of a solution containing 4M HCl, 4M HNO3, and 4M HF (all Optima grade) was added to the filter which was placed in a cleaned 22-mL PFA vial. The vial was tightly capped and heated to 110°C for 4 hours. This procedure has been determined to be adequate for digestion of all particulate material, while allowing the Supor filter to remain intact (Ohnemus et al. 2014). Following heating, the acid solution in the bomb was poured into a second PFA vial, leaving the filter piece behind. To ensure complete transfer of acid, the bombs were thoroughly rinsed with 3 × 0.5 mL aliquots of ultrapure water which were poured into the secondary vial. The secondary vial was then heated to dryness and the contents redissolved with 1 mL of a 50% Optima-grade HNO3 + 15% Optima-grade H2O2 (v/v of concentrated reagents) solution. This solution was again dried down and the contents redissolved with 2% HNO3.

All digests were analyzed using a Finnigan-MAT Element2 HR-ICP-MS at the University of Maine following the protocols outlined in Twining et al. (2011). The instrument is equipped with a cyclonic nebulizer, an autosampler contained under a HEPA filter, and nickel cones. Ba, Cd, La, Th, and Y were analyzed in low-resolution mode, while the remaining isotopes were analyzed in medium-resolution mode.

Quantification was performed by external calibration, and In-115 was used as an internal standard to correct for variations in instrumental sensitivity during analyses. Cs-133, spiked during the initial sample leaches, was used as a process recovery monitor, but no samples were discarded or corrected using the Cs recoveries, as typical Cs recoveries were 90-110%. Certified reference materials were digested alongside refractory sample digests. Average recoveries for each element are given in the attached supplemental file "CRMs.png".


Data Processing Description

All ICP-MS elemental concentration data were normalized to an In-115 internal standard and quantified using external standard curves. After accounting for sample dilutions due to acid digestion steps, quantities of each element per filter (pmol/filter) were calculated for each analytical run. The contribution of the ‘process blank’ (measured as the elements contained in an acid-washed filter through which 0.2-um filtered water was passed during the cruise) was then subtracted. Process blanks were pooled from across the cruise section. Separate process blanks were calculated for the labile (acetic acid/hydroxylamine) and refractory (HCl/HNO3/HF) digestions. The median process blanks for each digestion scheme and each element are given in the attached supplemental file "Blanks_and_DetectionLimits.png".

Following process blank correction, element concentrations (per volume of water filtered) were calculated by dividing the determined pmol/filter by the volume of water passed through each filter.

Detection limits are calculated as 3 times the standard deviation of the process blanks for the relevant digestion procedure after pooling of process blanks from across the transect.

Total element concentrations are calculated as the sum of the labile and refractory portions. Total concentrations are not reported if either the labile or refractory concentrations are below detection limits.

Description of data quality flags:

The standard Ocean Data View flags were used:

1: Good Value: Used when replicate samples were analyzed for a particular concentration.

2: Probably Good Value: Used when the reported value reflects analysis of a single replicate.

3: Probably Bad Value: Used when a value appears abnormally high or low (oceanographically inconsistent) based on adjacent depths or typical profile variability and shape using the context of relevant nearby stations.

6: Value Below Detection Limit: Used when value is below the detection limit for that given element. Empty values are reported rather than zero or a detection limit value.


BCO-DMO Processing Description

- reformatted column names to comply with BCO-DMO standards.
- filled in blank cells with "nd"
- added the DateTime column "ISO_DateTime_UTC"


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Data Files

File
stations.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 28.21 KB)
MD5:ce0e1ee609375cef48cffddd524f572f
Primary data file for dataset ID 663183

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Supplemental Files

File
Blanks_and_DetectionLimits.png
(Portable Network Graphics (.png), 283.98 KB)
MD5:ea6bb11db0c5391d4cd3b369a29648ed
Supplemental file for dataset ID 663183, version 1.
CRMs.png
(Portable Network Graphics (.png), 150.50 KB)
MD5:92d86b5aa7531a324619b3dd0b684220
Supplemental file for dataset ID 663183, version 1.

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Publications

Berger, C. J. M., Lippiatt, S. M., Lawrence, M. G., & Bruland, K. W. (2008). Application of a chemical leach technique for estimating labile particulate aluminum, iron, and manganese in the Columbia River plume and coastal waters off Oregon and Washington. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113. doi:10.1029/2007jc004703 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004703
Methods
Bruland, K. W., Franks, R. P., Knauer, G. A., & Martin, J. H. (1979). Sampling and analytical methods for the determination of copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel at the nanogram per liter level in sea water. Analytica Chimica Acta, 105, 233–245. doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(01)83754-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)83754-5
Methods
Ohnemus, D. C., Auro, M. E., Sherrell, R. M., Lagerström, M., Morton, P. L., Twining, B. S., … Lam, P. J. (2014). Laboratory intercomparison of marine particulate digestions including Piranha: a novel chemical method for dissolution of polyethersulfone filters. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 12(8), 530–547. doi:10.4319/lom.2014.12.530
Methods
Twining, B. S., Antipova, O., Chappell, P. D., Cohen, N. R., Jacquot, J. E., Mann, E. L., … Tagliabue, A. (2020). Taxonomic and nutrient controls on phytoplankton iron quotas in the ocean. Limnology and Oceanography Letters. doi:10.1002/lol2.10179
Results
Twining, B. S., Baines, S. B., Bozard, J. B., Vogt, S., Walker, E. A., & Nelson, D. M. (2011). Metal quotas of plankton in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 58(3-4), 325–341. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.08.018
Methods

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
description

PI issued sample ID

unitless
station

Station where sampling occurred

unitless
depth

Depth where sampling occurred

meters
lat

Latitude; N is positive

decimal degrees
lon

Longitude; W is positive

decimal degrees
date

Date of sampling; mm/dd/yy

unitless
time_gmt

Time of sampling; HH:MM

unitless
Cd_Labile

Labile concentration of Cadmium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
La_Labile

Labile concentration of Lanthanum

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Y_Labile

Labile concentration of Yttrium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Pb_Labile

Labile concentration of Lead

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ba_Labile

Labile concentration of Barium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Th_Labile

Labile concentration of Thorium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Al_Labile

Labile concentration of Aluminum

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Mn_Labile

Labile concentration of Maganese

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Fe_Labile

Labile concentration of Iron

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Co_Labile

Labile concentration of Cobalt

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Cu_Labile

Labile concentration of Copper

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ni_Labile

Labile concentration of Nickel

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
P_Labile

Labile concentration of Phosphorus

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ti_Labile

Labile concentration of Titanium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
V_Labile

Labile concentration of Vanadium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Zn_Labile

Labile concentration of Zinc

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Sc_Labile

Labile concentration of Scandium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Cd_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Cadmium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
La_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Lanthanum

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Y_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Yttrium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Pb_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Lead

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ba_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Barium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Th_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Thorium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Al_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Aluminum

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Mn_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Maganese

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Fe_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Iron

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Co_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Cobalt

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Cu_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Copper

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ni_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Nickel

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
P_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Phosphorus

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ti_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Titanium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
V_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Vanadium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Zn_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Zinc

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Sc_Refractory

Refractory concentration of Scandium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Cd_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cadmium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
La_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lanthanum

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Y_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Yttrium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Pb_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lead

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ba_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Barium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Th_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Thorium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Al_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Aluminum

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Mn_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Maganese

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Fe_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Iron

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Co_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cobalt

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Cu_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Copper

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ni_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Nickel

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
P_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Phosphorus

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Ti_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Titanium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
V_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Vanadium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Zn_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Zinc

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Sc_Total

Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Scandium

picomole per liter (pmol/L)
Cd_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Cadmium

unitless
La_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Lanthanum

unitless
Y_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Yttrium

unitless
Pb_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Lead

unitless
Ba_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Barium

unitless
Th_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Thorium

unitless
Al_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Aluminum

unitless
Mn_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Maganese

unitless
Fe_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Iron

unitless
Co_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Cobalt

unitless
Cu_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Copper

unitless
Ni_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Nickel

unitless
P_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Phosphorus

unitless
Ti_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Titanium

unitless
V_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Vanadium

unitless
Zn_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Zinc

unitless
Sc_LabileFlag

Quality flag for Labile concentration of Scandium

unitless
Cd_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Cadmium

unitless
La_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Lanthanum

unitless
Y_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Yttrium

unitless
Pb_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Lead

unitless
Ba_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Barium

unitless
Th_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Thorium

unitless
Al_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Aluminum

unitless
Mn_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Maganese

unitless
Fe_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Iron

unitless
Co_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Cobalt

unitless
Cu_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Copper

unitless
Ni_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Nickel

unitless
P_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Phosphorus

unitless
Ti_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Titanium

unitless
V_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Vanadium

unitless
Zn_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Zinc

unitless
Sc_RefrFlag

Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Scandium

unitless
Cd_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cadmium

unitless
La_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lanthanum

unitless
Y_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Yttrium

unitless
Pb_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lead

unitless
Ba_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Barium

unitless
Th_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Thorium

unitless
Al_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Aluminum

unitless
Mn_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Maganese

unitless
Fe_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Iron

unitless
Co_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cobalt

unitless
Cu_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Copper

unitless
Ni_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Nickel

unitless
P_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Phosphorus

unitless
Ti_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Titanium

unitless
V_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Vanadium

unitless
Zn_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Zinc

unitless
Sc_TotalFlag

Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Scandium

unitless
ISO_DateTime_UTC

Date/Time of sampling at station (UTC) ISO formatted

unitless


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Towed fish
Generic Instrument Name
GeoFish Towed near-Surface Sampler
Dataset-specific Description
Used to collect surface seawater samples
Generic Instrument Description
The GeoFish towed sampler is a custom designed near surface (

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Teflon-coated GO-Flo Bottle
Generic Instrument Name
GO-FLO Teflon Trace Metal Bottle
Dataset-specific Description
Used to collect trace metal-clean seawater samples
Generic Instrument Description
GO-FLO Teflon-lined Trace Metal free sampling bottles are used for collecting water samples for trace metal, nutrient and pigment analysis. The GO-FLO sampling bottle is designed specifically to avoid sample contamination at the surface, internal spring contamination, loss of sample on deck (internal seals), and exchange of water from different depths.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Deployments

MV1405

Website
Platform
R/V Melville
Start Date
2014-07-03
End Date
2014-07-26
Description
Deployment MV1405 on R/V Melville. Cruise took place during July 2014.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

Collaborative Research: Investigating the Ecological Importance of Iron Storage in Diatoms (Diatom Iron Storage)

Coverage: North Pacific, California coast and subarctic gyre


NSF Award Abstract:
Diatoms are responsible for a significant fraction of primary production in the ocean. They are associated with enhanced carbon export and usually dominate the response of phytoplankton to additions of the micronutrient iron in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions. Diatoms, particularly those isolated from the open ocean, appear to have a significant capacity to store iron for later use, and in some groups of diatoms this ability is enabled by the iron storage protein ferritin. Such luxury uptake of iron has long been observed in laboratory cultures and hypothesized to provide diatoms with an ecological benefit in the low-iron waters that cover 40% of the global ocean. However iron storage has been difficult to observe in natural systems due to the methodological challenges of working with mixed plankton assemblages, and a physiological understanding of the impacts of iron on ocean diatoms is lacking. This project combines state-of-the-art high-throughput transcriptomic sequencing and single-cell element analysis with novel laboratory and field incubation experiments to quantify iron storage abilities of cultured and natural diatoms that either contain or lack ferritin and determine the ecological impacts of this process. The overall objective of this project is to examine the ecological importance of iron storage as a selective mechanism controlling the distributions of diatoms along iron gradients in marine ecosystems. The proposed research includes three specific objectives:

A. Determine if there is a consistent physiological difference in the ability of pennate versus centric diatoms to store iron.

B. Examine whether iron storage capacities across diverse diatom taxa consistently provide a mechanistic explanation for continued growth in the absence of iron.

C. Determine whether enhanced iron storage provides diatoms with a competitive within natural phytoplankton assemblages in both coastal and oceanic regions.

Transcriptomic sequencing on a variety of ecologically important pennate and centric diatoms will be used to survey for the presence of ferritin-like genes in order to establish biogeographical and/or phylogenetic patterns of occurrence of diatom ferritin. Laboratory culture experiments will be used to quantify the iron storage abilities of these diatoms, as well as the number of cell divisions that can be supported by the stored iron, providing valuable physiological data to inform the understanding of plankton ecology in iron-limited coastal and HNLC systems. The laboratory experiments will be complemented by measurements of ferritin expression and iron storage in coastal and ocean diatoms sampled across gradients of iron availability on two cruises-of-opportunity to the northeast Pacific Ocean.

The NCBI bioproject page can be found here.



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]