Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Twining, Benjamin | Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences | Principal Investigator |
Rauschenberg, Sara | Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences | Contact |
Ake, Hannah | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Trace element concentrations in particles collected with GO-Flo bottles and analyzed with inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Concentrations of labile, refractory, and total metal fractions are reported.
Total, refractory, and labile particulate element concentrations via ICPMS:
Labile and total suspended particulate trace elements concentrations are reported for: Al, Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, La, Mn, Ni, P, Pb, Sc, Th, Ti, V, Y, Zn. Concentrations of the labile fraction of these particulate elements are indicated as element names followed by the suffix ‘-Labile’, refractory portions are indicated with the suffix ‘-Refractory’, and concentrations of total particulate elements (the sum of labile and refractory) are followed by ‘-Total’. Concentrations are reported in units of picomoles per liter (pmol/L).
Sampling Methodology:
Trace metal-clean seawater samples were collected using a sampling system consisting of Teflon-coated GO-Flo bottles and following methods described in Bruland et al (1979). Additional samples were collected from surface waters (~2 meters) using a towed ‘fish’ deployed by Ken Bruland's lab. Water collected with GO-Flo bottles and the ‘fish’ was transferred into acid-washed 4-liter (L) LDPE carboys for off-line filtration.
All filtration was conducted in a HEPA-filtered 'bubble' (temporary clean room). A filter holder containing a 25-millimeter (mm) diameter Pall Supor 0.4-micrometer (um) polyethersulfone membrane was attached to the opening at the carboy top. Carboys were pressurized with 0.2‐um filtered air and inverted during filtration to ensure that all particles were captured on the membrane. Filtrate was collected to determine the volume of seawater filtered: an average of 2.1L was filtered through each membrane. After filtration, membranes were folded into quarters, placed in 1.7-milliliter (mL) polypropylene vials, and stored at -20 degrees Celsius until analysis.
Analytical Methodology:
All digestion steps were performed in a Class-100 clean room using standard clean techniques. Filters were sequentially digested, first following the protocol of Berger et al. (2008) to obtain labile particulate concentrations and then digested using a 4M HCl, 4M HNO3, and 4M HF mixture as described in Ohnemus et al. (2014) to obtain refractory particulate element concentrations.
For the labile particulate leach, a 1-milliliter solution of 25% Optima-grade acetic acid and 0.02 M hydroxylamine was added to the filter stored in a 1.7 mL polypropylene vial. Following the recommendation of Berger et al. (2008), the solution was heated to 95 degrees C in a water bath for 10 minutes and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The filter was in contact with the acetic acid leach for a total of two hours, after which the filter was removed from the polypropylene vial and placed in an acid-cleaned 22-mL PFA vial. The acetic acid/hydroxylamine leachate was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 minutes to sediment all particles. Without disturbing particles on the bottom of the tube, approximately 0.8 mL of leachate was transferred into an acid-cleaned 7 mL PFA digestion vial. Optima-grade HNO3 was added (100 uL) to the digestion vial, which was subsequently heated uncapped at 110 degrees C to near dryness. Vial contents were redissolved with 2% HNO3 (Optima grade).
Refractory particulate metals were determined by subsequent digestion of the filter. Two milliliters of a solution containing 4M HCl, 4M HNO3, and 4M HF (all Optima grade) was added to the filter which was placed in a cleaned 22-mL PFA vial. The vial was tightly capped and heated to 110°C for 4 hours. This procedure has been determined to be adequate for digestion of all particulate material, while allowing the Supor filter to remain intact (Ohnemus et al. 2014). Following heating, the acid solution in the bomb was poured into a second PFA vial, leaving the filter piece behind. To ensure complete transfer of acid, the bombs were thoroughly rinsed with 3 × 0.5 mL aliquots of ultrapure water which were poured into the secondary vial. The secondary vial was then heated to dryness and the contents redissolved with 1 mL of a 50% Optima-grade HNO3 + 15% Optima-grade H2O2 (v/v of concentrated reagents) solution. This solution was again dried down and the contents redissolved with 2% HNO3.
All digests were analyzed using a Finnigan-MAT Element2 HR-ICP-MS at the University of Maine following the protocols outlined in Twining et al. (2011). The instrument is equipped with a cyclonic nebulizer, an autosampler contained under a HEPA filter, and nickel cones. Ba, Cd, La, Th, and Y were analyzed in low-resolution mode, while the remaining isotopes were analyzed in medium-resolution mode.
Quantification was performed by external calibration, and In-115 was used as an internal standard to correct for variations in instrumental sensitivity during analyses. Cs-133, spiked during the initial sample leaches, was used as a process recovery monitor, but no samples were discarded or corrected using the Cs recoveries, as typical Cs recoveries were 90-110%. Certified reference materials were digested alongside refractory sample digests. Average recoveries for each element are given in the attached supplemental file "CRMs.png".
All ICP-MS elemental concentration data were normalized to an In-115 internal standard and quantified using external standard curves. After accounting for sample dilutions due to acid digestion steps, quantities of each element per filter (pmol/filter) were calculated for each analytical run. The contribution of the ‘process blank’ (measured as the elements contained in an acid-washed filter through which 0.2-um filtered water was passed during the cruise) was then subtracted. Process blanks were pooled from across the cruise section. Separate process blanks were calculated for the labile (acetic acid/hydroxylamine) and refractory (HCl/HNO3/HF) digestions. The median process blanks for each digestion scheme and each element are given in the attached supplemental file "Blanks_and_DetectionLimits.png".
Following process blank correction, element concentrations (per volume of water filtered) were calculated by dividing the determined pmol/filter by the volume of water passed through each filter.
Detection limits are calculated as 3 times the standard deviation of the process blanks for the relevant digestion procedure after pooling of process blanks from across the transect.
Total element concentrations are calculated as the sum of the labile and refractory portions. Total concentrations are not reported if either the labile or refractory concentrations are below detection limits.
Description of data quality flags:
The standard Ocean Data View flags were used:
1: Good Value: Used when replicate samples were analyzed for a particular concentration.
2: Probably Good Value: Used when the reported value reflects analysis of a single replicate.
3: Probably Bad Value: Used when a value appears abnormally high or low (oceanographically inconsistent) based on adjacent depths or typical profile variability and shape using the context of relevant nearby stations.
6: Value Below Detection Limit: Used when value is below the detection limit for that given element. Empty values are reported rather than zero or a detection limit value.
- reformatted column names to comply with BCO-DMO standards.
- filled in blank cells with "nd"
- added the DateTime column "ISO_DateTime_UTC"
File |
---|
stations.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 28.21 KB) MD5:ce0e1ee609375cef48cffddd524f572f Primary data file for dataset ID 663183 |
File |
---|
Blanks_and_DetectionLimits.png (Portable Network Graphics (.png), 283.98 KB) MD5:ea6bb11db0c5391d4cd3b369a29648ed Supplemental file for dataset ID 663183, version 1. |
CRMs.png (Portable Network Graphics (.png), 150.50 KB) MD5:92d86b5aa7531a324619b3dd0b684220 Supplemental file for dataset ID 663183, version 1. |
Parameter | Description | Units |
description | PI issued sample ID | unitless |
station | Station where sampling occurred | unitless |
depth | Depth where sampling occurred | meters |
lat | Latitude; N is positive | decimal degrees |
lon | Longitude; W is positive | decimal degrees |
date | Date of sampling; mm/dd/yy | unitless |
time_gmt | Time of sampling; HH:MM | unitless |
Cd_Labile | Labile concentration of Cadmium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
La_Labile | Labile concentration of Lanthanum | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Y_Labile | Labile concentration of Yttrium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Pb_Labile | Labile concentration of Lead | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ba_Labile | Labile concentration of Barium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Th_Labile | Labile concentration of Thorium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Al_Labile | Labile concentration of Aluminum | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Mn_Labile | Labile concentration of Maganese | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Fe_Labile | Labile concentration of Iron | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Co_Labile | Labile concentration of Cobalt | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Cu_Labile | Labile concentration of Copper | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ni_Labile | Labile concentration of Nickel | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
P_Labile | Labile concentration of Phosphorus | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ti_Labile | Labile concentration of Titanium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
V_Labile | Labile concentration of Vanadium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Zn_Labile | Labile concentration of Zinc | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Sc_Labile | Labile concentration of Scandium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Cd_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Cadmium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
La_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Lanthanum | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Y_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Yttrium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Pb_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Lead | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ba_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Barium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Th_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Thorium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Al_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Aluminum | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Mn_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Maganese | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Fe_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Iron | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Co_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Cobalt | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Cu_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Copper | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ni_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Nickel | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
P_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Phosphorus | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ti_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Titanium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
V_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Vanadium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Zn_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Zinc | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Sc_Refractory | Refractory concentration of Scandium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Cd_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cadmium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
La_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lanthanum | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Y_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Yttrium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Pb_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lead | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ba_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Barium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Th_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Thorium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Al_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Aluminum | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Mn_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Maganese | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Fe_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Iron | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Co_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cobalt | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Cu_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Copper | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ni_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Nickel | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
P_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Phosphorus | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Ti_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Titanium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
V_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Vanadium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Zn_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Zinc | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Sc_Total | Total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Scandium | picomole per liter (pmol/L) |
Cd_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Cadmium | unitless |
La_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Lanthanum | unitless |
Y_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Yttrium | unitless |
Pb_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Lead | unitless |
Ba_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Barium | unitless |
Th_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Thorium | unitless |
Al_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Aluminum | unitless |
Mn_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Maganese | unitless |
Fe_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Iron | unitless |
Co_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Cobalt | unitless |
Cu_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Copper | unitless |
Ni_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Nickel | unitless |
P_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Phosphorus | unitless |
Ti_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Titanium | unitless |
V_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Vanadium | unitless |
Zn_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Zinc | unitless |
Sc_LabileFlag | Quality flag for Labile concentration of Scandium | unitless |
Cd_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Cadmium | unitless |
La_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Lanthanum | unitless |
Y_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Yttrium | unitless |
Pb_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Lead | unitless |
Ba_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Barium | unitless |
Th_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Thorium | unitless |
Al_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Aluminum | unitless |
Mn_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Maganese | unitless |
Fe_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Iron | unitless |
Co_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Cobalt | unitless |
Cu_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Copper | unitless |
Ni_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Nickel | unitless |
P_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Phosphorus | unitless |
Ti_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Titanium | unitless |
V_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Vanadium | unitless |
Zn_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Zinc | unitless |
Sc_RefrFlag | Quality flag for Refractory concentration of Scandium | unitless |
Cd_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cadmium | unitless |
La_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lanthanum | unitless |
Y_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Yttrium | unitless |
Pb_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Lead | unitless |
Ba_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Barium | unitless |
Th_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Thorium | unitless |
Al_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Aluminum | unitless |
Mn_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Maganese | unitless |
Fe_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Iron | unitless |
Co_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Cobalt | unitless |
Cu_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Copper | unitless |
Ni_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Nickel | unitless |
P_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Phosphorus | unitless |
Ti_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Titanium | unitless |
V_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Vanadium | unitless |
Zn_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Zinc | unitless |
Sc_TotalFlag | Quality flag for total particulate concentration (sum of Labile and Refractory) of Scandium | unitless |
ISO_DateTime_UTC | Date/Time of sampling at station (UTC) ISO formatted | unitless |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Towed fish |
Generic Instrument Name | GeoFish Towed near-Surface Sampler |
Dataset-specific Description | Used to collect surface seawater samples |
Generic Instrument Description | The GeoFish towed sampler is a custom designed near surface ( |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Teflon-coated GO-Flo Bottle |
Generic Instrument Name | GO-FLO Teflon Trace Metal Bottle |
Dataset-specific Description | Used to collect trace metal-clean seawater samples |
Generic Instrument Description | GO-FLO Teflon-lined Trace Metal free sampling bottles are used for collecting water samples for trace metal, nutrient and pigment analysis. The GO-FLO sampling bottle is designed specifically to avoid sample contamination at the surface, internal spring contamination, loss of sample on deck (internal seals), and exchange of water from different depths. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Melville |
Start Date | 2014-07-03 |
End Date | 2014-07-26 |
Description | Deployment MV1405 on R/V Melville. Cruise took place during July 2014. |
NSF Award Abstract:
Diatoms are responsible for a significant fraction of primary production in the ocean. They are associated with enhanced carbon export and usually dominate the response of phytoplankton to additions of the micronutrient iron in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) regions. Diatoms, particularly those isolated from the open ocean, appear to have a significant capacity to store iron for later use, and in some groups of diatoms this ability is enabled by the iron storage protein ferritin. Such luxury uptake of iron has long been observed in laboratory cultures and hypothesized to provide diatoms with an ecological benefit in the low-iron waters that cover 40% of the global ocean. However iron storage has been difficult to observe in natural systems due to the methodological challenges of working with mixed plankton assemblages, and a physiological understanding of the impacts of iron on ocean diatoms is lacking. This project combines state-of-the-art high-throughput transcriptomic sequencing and single-cell element analysis with novel laboratory and field incubation experiments to quantify iron storage abilities of cultured and natural diatoms that either contain or lack ferritin and determine the ecological impacts of this process. The overall objective of this project is to examine the ecological importance of iron storage as a selective mechanism controlling the distributions of diatoms along iron gradients in marine ecosystems. The proposed research includes three specific objectives:
A. Determine if there is a consistent physiological difference in the ability of pennate versus centric diatoms to store iron.
B. Examine whether iron storage capacities across diverse diatom taxa consistently provide a mechanistic explanation for continued growth in the absence of iron.
C. Determine whether enhanced iron storage provides diatoms with a competitive within natural phytoplankton assemblages in both coastal and oceanic regions.
Transcriptomic sequencing on a variety of ecologically important pennate and centric diatoms will be used to survey for the presence of ferritin-like genes in order to establish biogeographical and/or phylogenetic patterns of occurrence of diatom ferritin. Laboratory culture experiments will be used to quantify the iron storage abilities of these diatoms, as well as the number of cell divisions that can be supported by the stored iron, providing valuable physiological data to inform the understanding of plankton ecology in iron-limited coastal and HNLC systems. The laboratory experiments will be complemented by measurements of ferritin expression and iron storage in coastal and ocean diatoms sampled across gradients of iron availability on two cruises-of-opportunity to the northeast Pacific Ocean.
The NCBI bioproject page can be found here.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |