| Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Olson, M. Brady | Western Washington University (WWU) | Principal Investigator |
| Love, Brooke | Western Washington University (WWU) | Co-Principal Investigator |
| Strom, Suzanne | Western Washington University (WWU) | Co-Principal Investigator |
| Still, Kelly Ann | Western Washington University (WWU) | Student |
| Copley, Nancy | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Related Reference:
Still, Kelly Ann, Microzooplankton grazing, growth and gross growth efficiency are affected by pCO2 induced changes in phytoplankton biology. (Masters Thesis) Western Washington University. http://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1490&context=wwuet
The phytoplankton Rhodomonas sp. CCMP 755 was grown semi-continuously in atmosphere controlled chambers at three different CO2 treatment concentrations; Ambient (400ppmv), Moderate (750ppmv), and High (1000ppmv). Cultures were diluted daily starting day 4 with pre-equilibrated media containing f/50 nutrients. On day 9 Rhodomonas cells from the treatments were fed to starved Gyrodinium dominans cells for 15, 45, and 90 minutes. A 24-hour time point was also taken but scored at either “1” for containing any food or “0” for no food in the vacuole. During each sampling time point, 20 ml of experiment volume was removed, fixed with 0.5% glutaraldehyde and stained with DAPI. Samples were stored at 4° C for 12 hours to allow time for the DAPI to stain. This volume was filtered onto a 5 µm pore size polycarbonate filter with, which was then put on a slide with immersion oil and kept frozen until evaluation. Slides were evaluated under 400x using an epi-fluorescent microscope under blue-light excitation. The first 100 microzooplankton on each slide were assessed for each replicate/treatment, and individual prey cells were counted in the grazer food vacuole.
These data are unprocessed counts of the Rhodomonas cells ingested by each Gyrodinium grazer.
BCO-DMO Processing Notes:
- added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date
- modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions
- nd (no data) was entered into all blank cells
| File |
|---|
expt4a_Gyro_grazing.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 9.49 KB) MD5:0cc4139b82e904305db22a2409efe523 Primary data file for dataset ID 668661 |
| Parameter | Description | Units |
| grazer_analyzed | sample identifier: individual grazer analyzed | unitless |
| amb_15min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| amb_15min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| amb_15min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| amb_45min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| amb_45min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| amb_45min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| amb_90min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| amb_90min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| amb_90min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| amb_24hr_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| amb_24hr_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| amb_24hr_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: ambient pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| mod_15min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| mod_15min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| mod_15min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| mod_45min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| mod_45min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| mod_45min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| mod_90min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| mod_90min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| mod_90min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| mod_24hr_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| mod_24hr_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| mod_24hr_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: moderate pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| high_15min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| high_15min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| high_15min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 15 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| high_45min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| high_45min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| high_45min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 45 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| high_90min_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| high_90min_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| high_90min_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 90 minute grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| high_24hr_A | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate A | cells |
| high_24hr_B | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate B | cells |
| high_24hr_C | Rhodomonas cells counted inside the grazer: high pCO2 level; 24 hour grazing period; replicate C | cells |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | epi-fluorescent microscope under blue-light excitation |
| Generic Instrument Name | Fluorescence Microscope |
| Dataset-specific Description | For cell counts |
| Generic Instrument Description | Instruments that generate enlarged images of samples using the phenomena of fluorescence and phosphorescence instead of, or in addition to, reflection and absorption of visible light. Includes conventional and inverted instruments. |
| Website | |
| Platform | WWU |
| Start Date | 2011-03-31 |
| End Date | 2016-09-15 |
| Description | laboratory experiments |
Description from NSF award abstract:
The calcifying Haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi appears to be acutely sensitive to the rising concentration of ocean pCO2. Documented responses by E. huxleyi to elevated pCO2 include modifications to their calcification rate and cell size, malformation of coccoliths, elevated growth rates, increased organic carbon production, lowering of PIC:POC ratios, and elevated production of the active climate gas DMS. Changes in these parameters are mechanisms known to elicit alterations in grazing behavior by microzooplankton, the oceans dominant grazer functional group. The investigators hypothesize that modifications to the physiology and biochemistry of calcifying and non-calcifying Haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi in response to elevated pCO2 will precipitate alterations in microzooplankton grazing dynamics. To test this hypothesis, they will conduct controlled laboratory experiments where several strains of E. huxleyi are grown at several CO2 concentrations. After careful characterization of the biochemical and physiological responses of the E. huxleyi strains to elevated pCO2, they will provide these strains as food to several ecologically-important microzooplankton and document grazing dynamics. E. huxleyi is an ideal organism for the study of phytoplankton and microzooplankton responses to rising anthropogenic CO2, the effects of which in the marine environment are called ocean acidification; E. huxleyi is biogeochemically important, is well studied, numerous strains are in culture that exhibit variation in the parameters described above, and they are readily fed upon by ecologically important microzooplankton.
The implications of changes in microzooplankton grazing for carbon cycling, specifically CaCO3 export, DMS production, nutrient regeneration in surface waters, and carbon transfer between trophic levels are profound, as this grazing, to a large degree, regulates all these processes. E. huxleyi is a model prey organism because it is one of the most biogeochemically influential global phytoplankton. It forms massive seasonal blooms, contributes significantly to marine inorganic and organic carbon cycles, is a large producer of the climatically active gas DMS, and is a source of organic matter for trophic levels both above and below itself. The planned controlled study will increase our knowledge of the mechanisms that drive patterns of change between trophic levels, thus providing a wider array of tools necessary to understand the complex nature of ocean acidification field studies, where competing variables can confound precise interpretation.
| Funding Source | Award |
|---|---|
| NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |