Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Carr, Mark | University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC) | Principal Investigator |
Edwards, Christopher | Co-Principal Investigator | |
Garza, John Carlos | University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Copley, Nancy | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Tissue samples are collected from juvenile fish for genetic samples. Samples from juvenile fishes are collected from larval collectors (SMURFs) and by divers using collecting nets (BINCKE) at the kelp canopy surface. Juvenile fish are taken aboard a vessel, fin-clipped (a small portion of the second dorsal or caudal fin) to obtain tissue for genetic analysis, measured, and returned to nearby kelp canopy habitat. Dataset includes the date and location of sampling, species, individual length (total length to the nearest mm), and disposition of the sampled individual (sacrificed or released).
Data are entered by hand and double checked for accuracy. Dataset is checked for valid entries and completeness.
BCO-DMO Processing Notes:
- added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date
- modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions
- re-formatted date from m/d/yyyy to yyyy-mm-dd
- blank values replaced with no data value 'nd'
- changed lat/lon (0,0 - no location) to nd's
Dataset version 1 (2017-03-17) replaced by version 2 (2021-06-16)
* Rows for data with the following dates and gear/locations had a comment that was just a single double quote character ("). That was causing parsing issues in the dataset so the character was changed to the missing data identifier instead in data version 2.
File |
---|
fish_lens_juvenile.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 1.73 MB) MD5:a8baa46070ef531fac1864a25a13ab4e Primary data file for dataset ID 684453 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
date | date sample was collected formatted as yyyy-mm-dd | unitless |
gear | gear type used for collection: | unitless |
sample | Sample ID number. (NA if no sample taken) | unitless |
species | Code for fish species identification abbreviated as first letter of genus and first three letters of species names. See "species codes" worksheet for values and definitions. | unitless |
length_mm | total length of the fish (nd if no length measured) | millimeters (mm) |
fate | whether the fish was released live or killed for sampling: released; sacrificed; unknown | unitless |
condition | condition of fish released live: good; fair; poor; unknown | unitless |
count_fish_captured | number of individuals represented in this sample | individual |
count_samples | number of samples collected from this capture | sample |
lat_gps | latitude at which sample was collected; obtained from GPS unit | decimal degrees in WGS84 coordinate system |
lon_gps | longitude at which sample was collected; obtained from GPS unit | decimal degrees in WGS84 coordinate system |
concerns | comment | unitless |
comments | further comment | unitless |
year | sampling year | unitless |
month | sampling month | unitless |
day | sampling day | unitless |
location | samplling site code | unitless |
subregion | subregion of sampling area | unitless |
SMURF_array | identifier code of sampler | unitless |
date_delivered_to_NMFS | date sample was delivered to NMFS | unitless |
NMFS_id | sample identifier at NMFS; formatted as yyyy-mm-dd | unitless |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | |
Generic Instrument Name | BINCKE net |
Dataset-specific Description | Used by divers to collect juvenile fish |
Generic Instrument Description | The Benthic Ichthyofauna Net for Coral/Kelp Environments (BINCKE) is a rectangular net opened and closed by means of a rigid, hinged frame at one end and of variable size depending upon the size and behavior of targeted species. It is used for the collection of fishes from structurally complex environments (e.g., coral reefs, kelp forests.
See Anderson T.W. and M.H. Carr. 1998. BINCKE: A highly efficient net for collecting reef-associated fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 51:111-115. |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | SMURF |
Generic Instrument Name | larval fish collector |
Dataset-specific Description | SMURFs used in this study were adapted from a design used by Steele et al. (2002). Each SMURF (1.0×0.35 m dia.) was constructed using a 1.2×1.0 m section of green plastic mesh with 2.5 cm grid (Grow Guard™, model #038-2416, Israel) rolled into a cylinder. A haphazardly folded 4.5×1.2 m section of black plastic mesh with 5.0×7.5 cm grid (Conwed Plastics, model #XB 5968-100-SSF, USA) was inserted into the cylinder. The outer mesh of 2.5 cm grid did not restrict movement of settlement size fish into or out of the SMURF, it did however, prevent entry of larger fish.
M.A. Steele, J.C. Malone, A.M. Findlay, M.H. Carr, G.E. Forrester. A simple method for estimating larval supply in reef fishes and a preliminary test of population limitation by larval delivery in the kelp bass, Paralabrax clathratus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 235 (2002), pp. 195–203 |
Generic Instrument Description | The Standard Monitoring Unit for the recruitment of Reef Fishes (SMURF) consists of a cylinder of fine mesh plastic grid that contains a folded section of larger mesh plastic grid.
See Ammann, A.J. 2004. SMURFs: standard monitoring units for the recruitment of temperate reef fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 299:135– 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2003.08.014 |
Website | |
Platform | Long Marine Lab UCSC |
Start Date | 1999-09-22 |
End Date | 2015-07-24 |
Description | Sites of Kelp Forest Resilience project. Nearshore waters of southern Monterey Bay and Carmel Bay, California. 36 N, 121 W. |
Description from NSF award abstract:
The spatial structure and dynamics of coastal marine fish populations are strongly influenced by the transport and recruitment of larvae. However, the scale and patterns of larval dispersal are among the most difficult demographic parameters to quantify in marine systems, due to the inability to tag and track the movement of larvae. In particular, the extent of local retention of larvae versus regional dispersal to other locations and populations is currently a hotly debated topic in the field of marine ecology and has profound implications for the design and effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The research will identify patterns of larval dispersal and use those patterns to test predictions of dispersal generated by state-of-the-art circulation models.
The PI team brings together ecologists, geneticists, statisticians, and oceanographers with expertise in population demography and field sampling, mark/recapture data from genetic tags, and empirical and model-based evaluation of oceanographic processes to answer the following questions:
1. Do observed patterns of dispersal and connectivity of larval kelp rockfish correspond to patterns predicted by high spatial resolution regional ocean circulation models? Model predictions will be tested empirically using larval settlement samples. Parentage analysis will be used to verify the occurrence of larvae derived from genetically tagged source populations.
2. Is there evidence for local retention of larval kelp rockfish within the study area? To test the hypothesis that local retention of juvenile kelp rockfish from source populations is greater than expected by existing larval transport models, the PIs will compare the proportion of recruits that are genetically identified to have been produced from within three focal sites with the proportion of larval production that was tagged in those sites.
3. Is the relative recruitment of recently settled kelp rockfish to focal sites in the study region proportionate to the relative larval production of those focal sites? The PIs will compare the proportion of tagged recruits with the proportion of larval production generated from tagged adults at varying spatial scales. They will use goodness of fit models to compare expected and observed connectivity matrices under varying hypotheses of larval dispersal. Alternatively, if the relative contribution of focal sites to larval replenishment of themselves, one another, and more distant populations is disproportionate to their relative production, can this discrepancy be explained by oceanographic processes that could facilitate particular trajectories of larval dispersal?
To determine if differences in self recruitment and connectivity can be attributed to local oceanographic features, the PIs will examine spatial and temporal correlations between these features and the spatial distribution and timing of recruitment.
Related websites:
http://piscoweb.org
http://research.pbsci.ucsc.edu/eeb/rclab/kelp-rockfish-pbt-project/ (broken link)
http://rockfish.ucsc.edu/
http://oceanmodeling.ucsc.edu
The Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of Coastal Oceans is a long-term ecosystem research and monitoring program established with the goals of:
Over the last 10 years, PISCO has successfully built a unique research program that combines complementary disciplines to answer critical environmental questions and inform management and policy. Activities are conducted at the latitudinal scale of the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem along the west coast of North America, but anchored around the dynamics of coastal, hardbottom habitats and the oceanography of the nearshore ocean – among the most productive and diverse components of this ecosystem. The program integrates studies of changes in the ocean environment through ecological monitoring and experiments. Scientists examine the causes and consequences of ecosystem changes over spatial scales that are the most relevant to marine species and management, but largely unstudied elsewhere.
Findings are linked to solutions through a growing portfolio of tools for policy and management decisions. The time from scientific discovery to policy change is greatly reduced by coordinated, efficient links between scientists and key decision makers.
Core elements of PISCO are:
Established in 1999 with funding from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, PISCO is led by scientists from core campuses Oregon State University (OSU); Stanford University’s Hopkins Marine Station; University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC); and University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB). Collaborators from other institutions also contribute to leadership and development of PISCO programs. As of 2005, core PISCO activities are funded by collaborative grants from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Core support, along with additional funding from diverse public and private sources, make this unique partnership possible.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |