Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Edmunds, Peter J. | California State University Northridge (CSUN) | Principal Investigator |
Kelley, Thomas | National Park Service (NPS) | Contact |
Ake, Hannah | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Coral larvae are selective with regards to the surfaces upon which they settle, but little is known about the outcome of these choices. In this study, we explored the implications for juvenile scleractinians (less than 40-mm diameter) of growing on igneous versus carbonate rock on the shallow reefs (5-m depth) of St. John, US Virgin Islands. Surveys revealed that juvenile corals occurred at densities of 16 colonies m− 2 and were distributed on igneous and carbonate rocks in proportion to the abundance of these surfaces, suggesting that larvae do not discriminate between rock types at settlement. Repeated surveys demonstrated that all juvenile corals (i.e., pooled among taxa) grew 41% slower on igneous versus carbonate rock between January and August, but not between August and January when the growth was statistically indistinguishable between rock types. Although the growth of the most common juvenile coral, Porites astreoides, was similar on both substrata, the photophysiology of this species was affected by the type of rock. The maximum relative electron transfer rate (rETR, a proxy for photosynthesis) of P. astreoides was down-regulated 30% on igneous compared to carbonate rock. Phylogenetic analyses of the Symbiodinium community sequence profiles within P. astreoides revealed significant differences between substrata, with a greater diversity of co-occurring ITS-2 sequences in corals growing on carbonate compared to igneous rock. While substratum-dependent patterns in the characteristics of juvenile corals suggested there is selective value to the settlement choices made by larvae, these trends did not translate into differences in survival, at least over the time scale investigated. It remains uncertain what features of the rocks affected coral performance, but differences in the temperature of the rock may be an important feature during the warmest period of the year.
These data are from 5-9 m depth and describe the density of small corals ≤ 40 mm diameter.
BCO-DMO Processing Notes:
-Reformatted column names to comply with BCO-DMO standards.
-Added latitude and longitude to data
File |
---|
juveniles.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 415.12 KB) MD5:70fb98963a1a7a3fa579dddcd6845d4e Primary data file for dataset ID 736783 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
Site | Site where juvenile corals were sampled. | unitless |
lat | Latitude of site | decimal degrees |
lon | Longitude of site | decimal degrees |
Quadrat | Unique quadrat where corals were censused. | unitless |
Year | Year of survey; YYYY | unitless |
Acropora | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Agaricia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Colpohyllia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Dichocoenia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Diplora | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Eusmilia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Favia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Helioseris | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Isophyllastrea | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Madracis | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Manicina | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Meandrina | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Montastraea | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. Only M. cavernosa. | millimeters per meters squared |
Mycetophyllia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Porites | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Scolymia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Siderastrea | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Stephanocoenia | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Orbicella | Density of colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Total | Density of all small colonies per 0.25m^2. | millimeters per meters squared |
Total_less_Sr_and_Ff | All small colonies less Favia fragum and Sidersastrea radians that are sexually mature at < 4 cm diameter and therefore are not juveniles. | millimeters per meters squared |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Camera |
Generic Instrument Name | Camera |
Dataset-specific Description | Used to take photographs of coral |
Generic Instrument Description | All types of photographic equipment including stills, video, film and digital systems. |
Website | |
Platform | Virgin Islands National Park |
Start Date | 1987-01-01 |
End Date | 2016-09-01 |
Description | Studies of corals and hermit crabs |
Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) in US Virgin Islands:
From the NSF award abstract:
In an era of growing human pressures on natural resources, there is a critical need to understand how major ecosystems will respond, the extent to which resource management can lessen the implications of these responses, and the likely state of these ecosystems in the future. Time-series analyses of community structure provide a vital tool in meeting these needs and promise a profound understanding of community change. This study focuses on coral reef ecosystems; an existing time-series analysis of the coral community structure on the reefs of St. John, US Virgin Islands, will be expanded to 27 years of continuous data in annual increments. Expansion of the core time-series data will be used to address five questions: (1) To what extent is the ecology at a small spatial scale (1-2 km) representative of regional scale events (10's of km)? (2) What are the effects of declining coral cover in modifying the genetic population structure of the coral host and its algal symbionts? (3) What are the roles of pre- versus post-settlement events in determining the population dynamics of small corals? (4) What role do physical forcing agents (other than temperature) play in driving the population dynamics of juvenile corals? and (5) How are populations of other, non-coral invertebrates responding to decadal-scale declines in coral cover? Ecological methods identical to those used over the last two decades will be supplemented by molecular genetic tools to understand the extent to which declining coral cover is affecting the genetic diversity of the corals remaining. An information management program will be implemented to create broad access by the scientific community to the entire data set.
The importance of this study lies in the extreme longevity of the data describing coral reefs in a unique ecological context, and the immense potential that these data possess for understanding both the patterns of comprehensive community change (i.e., involving corals, other invertebrates, and genetic diversity), and the processes driving them. Importantly, as this project is closely integrated with resource management within the VI National Park, as well as larger efforts to study coral reefs in the US through the NSF Moorea Coral Reef LTER, it has a strong potential to have scientific and management implications that extend further than the location of the study.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Environmental Biology (NSF DEB) |