Dataset: Sea urchin density at each site studied with respect to Clathromorphum bioerosion, at central and western Aleutian Islands, Alaska from visual surveys, July 2014

ValidatedFinal no updates expectedDOI: 10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.755218.1Version 1 (2019-01-30)Dataset Type:Cruise Results

Principal Investigator: Robert S. Steneck (University of Maine)

Co-Principal Investigator: James A. Estes (University of California-Santa Cruz)

Co-Principal Investigator: Douglas B. Rasher (Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences)

BCO-DMO Data Manager: Nancy Copley (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)


Program: Science, Engineering and Education for Sustainability NSF-Wide Investment (SEES): Ocean Acidification (formerly CRI-OA) (SEES-OA)

Project: Ocean Acidification: Century Scale Impacts to Ecosystem Structure and Function of Aleutian Kelp Forests (OA Kelp Forest Function)


Abstract

Sea urchin density with respect to Clathromorphum bioerosion at central and western Aleutian Islands, Alaska from visual surveys, July 2014. Estimates were derived from visual surveys, performed via SCUBA.

Prior to examining Clathromorphum bioerosion at each focal study site, we characterized sea urchin community structure at each site by quantifying the density, size frequency distribution, and biomass of the sea urchin community (primarily Strongylocentrotus polyacanthus), using the same methods that have been employed by us and others over the past 30 years (Estes et al. 2010). We characterized two types of sites: (1) those that have long persisted as urchin barrens (“habitat.type” = “Barren”) and (2) urchin barrens that are situated immediately adjacent to shallow, remnant kelp stands, and thereby receive urchin food subsidies (“habitat.type” = “Barren + kelp subsidy”). At these latter sites, we also surveyed the adjacent kelp stand (“habitat.type” = “Shallow kelp”).

At each site, a diver placed a 0.25-m^2 quadrat on the reef at the target depth and counted all urchins within the quadrat, then collected the urchins in a bag. The diver then took a random number of kicks along the same depth contour and repeated this process until 20 quadrats were sampled or 200 urchins collected, whichever occurred first. If 200 urchins were collected quickly, additional density counts were made to yield a better density estimate (n = 4 minimum). Shipside, we measured the size (test diameter; mm) of each collected urchin with calipers. We then calculated its biomass using a known size-weight relationship (Estes et al. 2010). To estimate total urchin biomass for a site (grams per 0.25-m^2), we summed the biomass of all urchins collected at the site and divided that sum by the number of quadrats deployed.


Related Datasets

No Related Datasets

Related Publications

Methods

Estes, J. A., Tinker, M. T., & Bodkin, J. L. (2010). Using Ecological Function to Develop Recovery Criteria for Depleted Species: Sea Otters and Kelp Forests in the Aleutian Archipelago. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 852–860. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01428.x