Trial A test of the dissolution method for estimates of the 15N2 atom% of incubations

Website: https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/778126
Data Type: experimental
Version: 1
Version Date: 2019-10-02

Project
» EAGER: Collaborative Research: Detection limit in marine nitrogen fixation measurements - Constraints of rates from the mesopelagic ocean (EAGER NitFix)
ContributorsAffiliationRole
Granger, JulieUniversity of Connecticut (UConn)Principal Investigator
Bourbonnais, AnnieUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth (UMass Dartmouth)Co-Principal Investigator
Wilson, SamuelUniversity of Hawai'i (UH)Co-Principal Investigator
Biddle, MathewWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO)BCO-DMO Data Manager

Abstract
The “dissolution” method to measure N2 fixation rates with 15N2 gas tracer involves the preparation of 15N2-enriched water that is then added to each incubation bottle. Investigators typically measure the 15N2 atom% of the 15N2-enriched inoculum by MIMS, and extrapolate the 15N2 atom% in the incubations based on the inoculum value. Here, we demonstrate that such extrapolation yields inaccurate estimates of the 15N2 atom% of incubations. The latter should be measured directly.


Dataset Description

Trial A test of the dissolution method


Methods & Sampling

Inocula of 15N2-enriched water were prepared according to either of two protocols outlined by Klawonn et al. (2015). 
In a first Trial A, respective 1.9 mL of 15N2 gas aliquots (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Lot #I-21065) were injected into crimped-sealed 120 mL glass serum vials filled with deionized water. To dissolve the 15N2 bubble, each of the two serum vials was vortexed for 5 minutes. Two subsamples of each inoculum were dispensed into Exetainers™ with a peristaltic pump for analysis on the MIMS. An aliquot of each inoculum (5 % vol/vol) was then dispensed in replicate 160 mL serum incubation bottles containing air-equilibrated deionized water (Trials A1-A4), which were then crimped-sealed. Following homogenization, triplicate subsamples of each incubation were collected in Exetainers™ for MIMS analysis. The 15N atom % of the inocula and of the corresponding incubations were measured by MIMS at the University of Connecticut (Bay Instruments) and computed as follows: 

Equation 4: equation 4

In both trials, the concentration of N2 isotopologues (m/z 28, 29, and 30) in each of the 15N2-enriched inocula was then extrapolated from the ionization efficiency of N isotopologues in air-equilibrated seawater. We define the ionization efficiency as the ratio of the isotopologue ion current measured by MIMS relative to its concentration in air-equilibrated seawater (ASW): 
 
Equation S2: equation S2
For instance, at a temperature of 25ºC and salinity of 35 psu, the solubility coefficients of Hamme and Emerson (2004) predict a N2 concentration of 388.9 μmol kg-1. The fraction of 15N in N2 (i.e., 15N/(14N+15N)) for air-equilibrated seawater is 0.003663 (Mariotti, 1983), such that the expected fractions of 28N2, 29N2, and 30N2 derived from their binomial probability distributions are as follows:
 
equation s3a
  = 99.2687 % Equation S3a
equation s3b= 0.7299 % Equation S3b
equation s3c= 0.0013 % Equation S3c
 
Accordingly, air-equilibrated concentrations of 28N2, 29N2, and 30N2 at this temperature and salinity are 386.0, 2.8, and 0.005 μmol kg-1, respectively. The ionization efficiency of the isotopologues is then equal to the ion current of m/z 28 recorded for ASW divided by the corresponding 28N2 concentration (Eq. S2). We used the ionization efficiency of m/z 28 in ASW to derive the N2 isotopologue concentrations in the inocula from their respective MIMS ion currents. We did not derive distinct ionization efficiencies from the ion current-to-concentration of m/z 29 and 30 in ASW, as these isotopologues are poorly resolved by the MIMS at natural abundance. Thus, we are assuming that the ionization efficiency of m/z 29 and 30 isotopologues is roughly similar to that of m/z 28 (i.e., that ionization isotope effects are negligible for our purposes). The initial expected AN2 of the “incubations” was then calculated using a linear mixing model with N2 isotopologue concentrations in ambient and enriched seawater

Data Processing Description

BCO-DMO Processing Notes:
- table was extracted from original spreadsheet.
- added conventional header with dataset name, PI name, version date
- modified parameter names to conform with BCO-DMO naming conventions

 


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Data Files

File
trial_a.csv
(Comma Separated Values (.csv), 6.16 KB)
MD5:2298e8da89522e950fdb4b6cf8296398
Primary data file for dataset ID 778126

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Supplemental Files

File
equation 4 EAGER_NitFix
filename: equation_4.jpg
(JPEG Image (.jpg), 24.62 KB)
MD5:25f19b478991407bd347bd9221c4857b
The 15N atom % of the inocula and of the corresponding incubations were measured by MIMS at the University of Connecticut (Bay Instruments) and computed using this equation.
equation S2 Eager_NitFix
filename: equation_s2.jpg
(JPEG Image (.jpg), 23.66 KB)
MD5:af88aa623a8e948669b26dbeb4dbaeaf
Equation for the definition of the ionization efficiency as the ratio of the isotopologue ion current measured by MIMS relative to its concentration in air-equilibrated seawater (ASW).
equation s3a Eager_NitFix
filename: equation_s3a.jpg
(JPEG Image (.jpg), 9.58 KB)
MD5:fdc41b085863b05134fbb25f6cc25c54
Equation for the binomial probability distribution for 28N2.
equation s3b Eager_NitFix
filename: equation_s3b.jpg
(JPEG Image (.jpg), 22.12 KB)
MD5:d7200880be28043d090d28bebeda9d12
Equation for the binomial probability distribution for 29N2.
equation s3c Eager_NitFix
filename: equation_s3c.jpg
(JPEG Image (.jpg), 14.71 KB)
MD5:04c7942d3273c43e9c10e3ed2b41b0fd
Equation for the binomial probability distribution for 30N2.

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Related Publications

White, A. E., Granger, J., Selden, C., Gradoville, M. R., Potts, L., Bourbonnais, A., Fulweiler, R. W., Knapp, A. N., Mohr, W., Moisander, P. H., Tobias, C. R., Caffin, M., Wilson, S. T., Benavides, M., Bonnet, S., Mulholland, M. R., & Chang, B. X. (2020). A critical review of the 15N2 tracer method to measure diazotrophic production in pelagic ecosystems. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 18(4), 129–147. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10353
Results

[ table of contents | back to top ]

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionUnits
Sample

sample

unitless
Baro_Press

barometric pressue

unknown
Time_of_analysis

time of analysis

unitless
m_z_28

mass-to-charge

unitless
m_z_29

mass-to-charge

unitless
m_z_30

mass-to-charge

unitless
m_z_32

mass-to-charge

unitless
m_z_40

mass-to-charge

unitless
N2_Ar

N2/Ar ratio

unitless
ratio_28_29

28/29 ratio

unitless
ratio_28_30

28/30 ratio

unitless
meas_at_pcnt

measured atom percent

unitless
avg_measured_a_pcnt

average measured atom percent

unitless


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Instruments

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer
Generic Instrument Name
Isotope-ratio Mass Spectrometer
Dataset-specific Description
continuous flow Delta V Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (Smith et al. 2015), and continuous flow-GV Isoprime IRMS (Charoenpong et al., 2014)
Generic Instrument Description
The Isotope-ratio Mass Spectrometer is a particular type of mass spectrometer used to measure the relative abundance of isotopes in a given sample (e.g. VG Prism II Isotope Ratio Mass-Spectrometer).

Dataset-specific Instrument Name
Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer
Generic Instrument Name
Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer
Dataset-specific Description
Membrane Inlet Mass Spectrometer (Bay Instruments)
Generic Instrument Description
Membrane-introduction mass spectrometry (MIMS) is a method of introducing analytes into the mass spectrometer's vacuum chamber via a semipermeable membrane.


[ table of contents | back to top ]

Project Information

EAGER: Collaborative Research: Detection limit in marine nitrogen fixation measurements - Constraints of rates from the mesopelagic ocean (EAGER NitFix)

Coverage: North Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean


NSF Award Abstract:
The availability of nitrogen is required to support the growth and production of organisms living in the surface of our global ocean. This element can be scarce. To alleviate this scarcity, a special class of bacteria and archaea, called nitrogen fixers, can derive the nitrogen needed for growth from nitrogen gas. This project would carefully examine one specific method for measuring nitrogen fixation that has been used recently to suggest the occurrence of small amounts of nitrogen fixation in subsurface ocean waters. If these reports are verified, then a revision of our understanding of the marine nitrogen cycle may be needed. The Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry program will be used as a platform to develop community consensus for best practices in nitrogen fixation measurements and detection of diversity, activity, and abundances of the organisms responsible. In addition, a session will be organized in a future national/international conference to communicate with the broader scientific community while developing these best practices.

The goal of this study is to conduct a thorough examination of potential experimental and analytical errors inherent to the 15N2-tracer nitrogen fixation method, in tandem with comprehensive molecular measurements, in mesopelagic ocean waters. Samples will be collected and experimental work conducted on a cruise transect in the North Atlantic Ocean, followed by analytical work in the laboratory. The specific aims of this study are to (1) determine the minimum quantifiable rates of 15N2 fixation based on incubations of mesopelagic waters via characterization of sources of experimental and analytical error, and (2) seek evidence of presence and expression of nitrogen fixation genes via comprehensive molecular approaches on corresponding samples. The range of detectable rates and diazotroph activity from the measurements made in this study will be informative for the understanding of the importance of nitrogen fixation in the oceanic nitrogen budget.



[ table of contents | back to top ]

Funding

Funding SourceAward
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE)

[ table of contents | back to top ]