Dataset: Sparging Chamber Testing: radon activity - experimental
View Data: Data not available yet
Data Citation:
Peterson, R. N., Breier, J. (2020) Sparging chamber test results of radon activity from laboratory experiments to optimize chamber configuration for Radon-222 analysis. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). Version Date 2020-10-19 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/827014 [access date]
Terms of Use
This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
If you wish to use this dataset, it is highly recommended that you contact the original principal investigators (PI). Should the relevant PI be unavailable, please contact BCO-DMO (info@bco-dmo.org) for additional guidance. For general guidance please see the BCO-DMO Terms of Use document.
Temporal Extent: 2010-09-21 - 2012-08-02
Project:
Principal Investigator:
Richard N. Peterson (Coastal Carolina University)
Co-Principal Investigator:
John Breier (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI)
BCO-DMO Data Manager:
Nancy Copley (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI BCO-DMO)
Version:
0
Version Date:
2020-10-19
Restricted:
No
Validated:
No
Current State:
Preliminary and in progress
Sparging chamber test results of radon activity from laboratory experiments to optimize chamber configuration for Radon-222 analysis
Abstract:
These data were collected in order to optimize a new method for degassing dissolved radon-222 from water. The general premise is the use of a sparging chamber (‘Bell’) that is deployed underwater and uses bubbles to degas the radon. This dataset includes the experimental (Bell) results. See also the control dataset (https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/826844). See methodology outlined in Peterson et al., 2013 (Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry). The sparging chamber is connected to a commercially-available radon-in-air monitor (RAD7; Durridge Co.) via a closed air loop. Air exiting the RAD7 circulates to the bottom of the sparging chamber where it enters via aquarium bubblers. The bubbles rise through the sparging chamber and accumulate in a headspace, from which air is pumped through desiccant back to the RAD7. Our control to which we compare the sparging chamber is the commercially-available RAD-Aqua (Durridge Co.) which sprays a water sample into a chamber rather than using bubbles. Otherwise, the setups are similar. Data contained herein are various laboratory testing configurations to optimize dimensions of the sparging chamber, number and type of bubblers, and any benefits from adding an additional sprayer capability to the top of the sparging chamber. All configurations tested are accompanied by a number of replicates.