Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Freestone, Amy L. | Temple University (Temple) | Principal Investigator, Contact |
Ruiz, Gregory E. | Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (SERC) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Torchin, Mark E. | Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Jurgens, Laura J. | Temple University (Temple) | Scientist |
Schlöder, Carmen | Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) | Scientist |
Bonfim, Mariana | Temple University (Temple) | Student |
López, Diana Paola | Temple University (Temple) | Student |
Repetto, Michele F. | Temple University (Temple) | Student |
Newman, Sawyer | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Richness of sessile marine invertebrate communities from coastal sites across a latitudinal gradient spanning the subarctic to the tropics. Communities developed for three or 12 months under nine different treatments that tested the effect of predation and competition. Caging was used to reduce predation pressure and biomass removals opened up space, a limiting resource in sessile communities.
Methodology:
Marine invertebrate communities developed on PVC settlement panels (14 x 14 cm) hung on floating docks one meter below the water surface at local marinas at three coastal sites in each region (Panama, Mexico, California, Alaska). Communities developed for three or 12 months under the following treatments: caged (i.e. reduced predation), partial cage (i.e. procedural cage control; ambient predation) and (c) open (i.e. ambient predation). Caging material had a mesh size of 0.635 cm. These treatments were fully crossed with biomass removals of 0%, approximately 20% (actual 18%, 36cm2) or approximately 60% (actual 54%, 107cm2) panel surface scrapes. On panels assigned a removal treatment, a total of three parallel scrapes or one scrape positioned randomly on the surface of the panel to reach the 60% or 20% surface opening was performed, respectively. Communities that assembled for three months received two removal rounds (1 and 2 months after deployment) while those that assembled for 12 months received five rounds (1, 2, 6, 10, and 11 months after deployment) before the richness of each community was assessed. Experiments were initiated in Alaska in June 2015, California in May 2016, Mexico in June 2017, and Panama in December 2015.
Sampling and analytical procedures:
Following the assigned developmental period and approximately one month after the last biomass removal, communities were retrieved and brought back to a laboratory for assessment.
Sessile marine invertebrates from each community were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible using a stereoscope and were assigned a species or a consistent morphospecies identifier. Identifications were confirmed by taxonomic experts and DNA barcodes whenever possible. Species richness provided here is a comprehensive list of sessile invertebrate species observed per community, including species that were captured in point count (composition) measures and those that were not.
BCO-DMO Processing Notes:
File |
---|
abc_biovision_dataarchive_mainexp_3mo12mo_26may21-1.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 2.22 MB) MD5:397db3b911149db6c8756d1f3a374a01 Primary data file for dataset ID 861234 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
Region | Region where each taxon was collected (Alaska, California, Mexico, Panama) | unitless |
Site_name | Complete site name | unitless |
Site_code | Unique site abbreviation (two letter code) | unitless |
Latitude | Latitude of site where communities developed. Negative values indicate South. | decimal degrees |
Longitude | Longitude of site where communities developed. Negative values indicate West. | decimal degrees |
Plate_ID | Unique panel (community) reference number | unitless |
Deploy_date | Date when experimental communities (panels) were deployed for a 3 or 12 month developmental period. Format: YYYY-MM-DD. | unitless |
Retrieve_date | Date when experimental communities (panels) were retrieved after a 3 or 12 month developmental period | unitless |
Deploy_duration | Length of developmental period (3 or 12-month) | number of months |
Treatment_type | Treatment description. full =full cage; open = no cage; partial = partial cage | unitless |
Comp_removal | Biomass removal. 0 = no biomass removal; 20 = 20% surface scrape; 60 = 60% surface scrape | unitless |
Type | Invertebrate type sessile or mobile | unitless |
Morph_taxa | Family or higher taxonomic information. Bare = panel surface on point, no organism present | unitless |
Morph_taxa_num | Unique morphospecies number identifier | unitless |
MorphName | Lower taxonomic information (~genus/species, if available) based on best available information in the field | unitless |
InvStatus | Invasion status: nat = native or cryptogenic, int = introduced | unitless |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Stereoscope |
Generic Instrument Name | Microscope - Optical |
Dataset-specific Description | Sessile marine invertebrates from each community were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible using a stereoscope and were assigned a species or a consistent morphospecies identifier |
Generic Instrument Description | Instruments that generate enlarged images of samples using the phenomena of reflection and absorption of visible light. Includes conventional and inverted instruments. Also called a "light microscope". |
Description from NSF award abstract:
Global patterns of biodiversity demonstrate that most of the species on earth occur in the tropics, with strikingly fewer species occurring in higher-latitude regions. Biologists predict that this global pattern of species diversity is likely shaped by thee ecological interactions between species. Yet few detailed experimental data exist that demonstrate how species interactions influence natural communities from the tropics to the arctic. Therefore, a significant opportunity exists to transform our understanding of how these fundamental species interactions shape patterns of biodiversity across the globe. Furthermore, these species interactions have the strong potential to limit potentially harmful biological invasions by non-native species, which are often transported by human activities that can breach historical dispersal barriers, such as ocean basins and continents. Biological invasions can cause undesired ecological and economic effects and are considered one of the primary drivers of global change. Through extensive field research on marine ecosystems along the Pacific Coast of North and Central America, from the tropics to the subarctic, this project will study ecological factors that shape global patterns of diversity and limit biological invasions.
Biologists have long theorized that the latitudinal diversity gradient may be shaped by stronger species interactions, such as competition and predation, occurring in the tropics than at higher latitudes. Prior research suggests that predation pressure is indeed stronger at lower latitudes, but it is unclear how interactive effects of predation and competition structure communities to maintain these diversity patterns in ecological time. This project represents an international research program to expand ecological understanding of species interactions across latitude. The objectives are to determine the relative influences of two primary species interactions, competition and predation, on patterns of species diversity, community assembly and sensitivity to species invasion. Field research will employ a large-scale experimental approach that focuses on sessile marine invertebrate communities across 47 degrees of latitude (over 7000 km). Experiments will manipulate levels of predation and competition for one year and will be conducted in four regions, ranging from the subarctic to the tropics: Alaska, California, Mexico, and Panama. Communities of sessile marine invertebrates, composed of both native and non-native species, will be examined iteratively under different predation and competition regimes to evaluate community dynamics. The relative importance of a suite of factors, including environmental conditions and recruitment rates, to interaction outcomes will be evaluated.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |