| Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Balch, William M. | Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Bates, Nicholas | Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS) | Co-Principal Investigator |
| McGillicuddy, Dennis J. | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) | Co-Principal Investigator |
| Morton, Peter L. | Florida State University - National High Magnetic Field Lab (FSU - NHMFL) | Co-Principal Investigator |
| Drapeau, David T. | Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences | Contact |
| Rauch, Shannon | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
R/V Roger Revelle (cruise ID RR2004) departed Honolulu, Hawaii on 26 December 2020. The ship transited south along the great circle route from Honolulu to 30°S x 150°W.
Sampling Overview:
Hydrographic profiles were performed along the transect with the CTD (the "full-water cast"), sampling for Freons, dissolved oxygen, DIC, alkalinity (and all other parameters of the carbonate cycle using the CO2-SYS program), extracted chlorophyll, nutrients, POC, PIC, biogenic silica, coccolithophore counts and FlowCAM analyses (for enumerating and classification of nanoplankton and microplankton species). Each CTD full-water cast was alternated with a "trip-on-fly" water cast. The latter casts involved tripping bottles at 24 depths "on the fly" as they passed the following 24 depth targets: 1000 meters (m), 900m, 800m, 700m,600m 500m, 450m, 400m, 350m, 300m, 250m, 200m, 150m, 120m, 110m, 100m, 90m, 80m, 70m, 60m, 50m, 40m, 25m, 5m. These later casts were used only to sample full water properties at the surface only, as well as DIC and nutrients at eight depths. These trip-on-fly casts served to provide greater resolution in hydrographic sections across the features. Once per day, typically pre-dawn, CTD casts included samples drawn for primary productivity and calcification. These measurements involved the use of 14C-bicarbonate and all manipulations were done in a portable radioisotope van on deck.
Sampling for trace metals was performed daily using nine Niskin-X bottles clamped to nonmetallic Aracom line, hung at depths to ~1000m and tripped with nonmetallic messengers. All trace-metal-clean manipulations were performed in a trace-metal-clean laboratory or a plastic bubble built within the ship's wet lab. Five carboy experiments were performed over the cruise, which involved incubating surface, trace-metal-clean water collected by a "Big Jon" surface sampler (towed from the side of the ship at 1-3 knots (kts), which maintained a distance of 5-10m from the side of the ship as it pumped surface water into two 200-liter (L) plastic tanks within the wet lab bubble). For three of the carboy experiments, the investigators conducted triplicate incubations of untreated control water plus five treatments (three replicates each) in plastic, acid-cleaned cubitainers with a) 5% dilution with subsurface water, b) 20-micromoles (uM) trace metal-clean nitrate, (c) 20 uM trace metal-silicate, (d) 1 nanomole (nM) of iron and (e) 1 nM of iron+20 um of silicate 6. The cubitainers were then sampled approximately every other day for 4-5 days while being incubated under surface light conditions in an on-deck incubator, with temperature maintained at T0 in-situ surface conditions. The carboys were sampled about every two days by the Balch group for chlorophyll, nutrients, PIC, POC, biogenic silica, quantitative coccolithophore counts, and quantitative FlowCAM samples (for enumeration of algal classes, cell volumes, and slope of the particle-size distribution). Later in the cruise, for two of the carboy experiments, due to time constraints with two simultaneous incubations, incubations could only be performed with a control and two treatments of (a) 5% subsurface water and (b) 2 nM iron).
Sampling Methods:
At sea collections: Water samples were collected using CTD casts from 103 stations encompassing Subtropical, Subantarctic and Polar waters in the Pacific Sector of the Southern Ocean. Discrete samples were taken from 10L Niskin bottles for the following measurements:
1. Chlorophyll - Water samples were filtered onto a 25-millimeter (mm) Millipore HA filter (mixed cellulose ester, 0.45-micrometer (µm) pore size). The filters were transferred to test tubes filled with chilled 90% acetone for extraction and vortexed until the filter dissolved. Tubes were stored in the dark in a freezer for 24 hours before analysis. Tubes were then re-vortexed and gently centrifuged (~1300g) for 5 minutes before being decanted into a glass cuvette for the fluorometer. A Turner Designs 10AU was used to read Fb of the sample and then, after adding 50 microliters (µl) of 10% HCL, to read Fa. The fluorometer was calibrated pre-cruise with a pure chlorophyll extract (Turner Designs part# 10-850) to determine Tau τ=(Fb/Fa pure chl a) and chlorophyll a was then calculated from: (Fb – Fa) * (τ/ τ-1) * (Vfiltered/Vextracted). Generally, all surface measurements were made in triplicate. The fluorometers (Turner 10-AUs) were calibrated using the calibration method defined by Turner Designs using standards purchased from Turner Designs. Additionally, for long cruises such as this cruise, a calibration was performed on the ship. References: Trees, et al.
2. Particulate organic carbon (POC) plus particulate organic nitrogen (PON) - Water samples were filtered onto 25 mm GF/F filters which were pre-combusted (450°, 5 hours). Filters were rinsed with filtered seawater (FSW) and then stored in individual petri-plates and dried (60°) for storage. Prior to analysis, the plates were opened and placed overnight in a sealed container like a dessicator with saturated HCL fumes to remove any particulate inorganic carbon (PIC). These samples were run by the Bigelow Laboratory Analytical Facility. The filters were packed into pre-combusted nickel sleeves and analyzed on a Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II CHNS/O for C, N, and H. The analyzer was calibrated using tin capsules as blanks and acetanilide to calibrate instrument response to carbon and nitrogen. NIST-certified check standards consisting of either low organic content soil or sediment are analyzed to determine accuracy of carbon detection. NIST-certified organic check standards such as corn flour or rice flour were analyzed to determine the accuracy of nitrogen detection. If values varied by more than 4% from stated values, the instrument was examined, any problems were addressed and the instrument was recalibrated and checked standards rerun until the error was within acceptable limits. Duplicate samples were run during each sample run to ensure results were reproducible. If duplicates could not be run on actual samples, as in the case of filter samples, duplicate check standards were analyzed. Duplicate samples typically varied less than 2%. One instrument blank was analyzed for every 12 samples run. One acetanilide standard was analyzed for every 15 samples run. If blank or acetanilide values differed significantly from previous values, a new series of standards and blanks were analyzed to recalibrate the instrument. The actual minimum detection limit (3 times the standard error) determined from the standard error of the instrument blanks is 2 micrograms for carbon and 4 micrograms for nitrogen. References: JGOFS (1996).
3. PIC (Particulate Inorganic Carbon) - Water samples were filtered through a 25mm, 0.4 µm pore size polycarbonate filter. The dry filter was rinsed with Potassium tetraborate (6.11 grams per liter K₂B₄O₇ · 4H₂O) buffer while still in the filter tower to remove as much seawater salt and also to maintain a high pH (~8.1) during sample storage and to preserve the CaCO₃ on the filter. Filters were placed into trace metal clean polypropylene centrifuge tubes and dried at approximately 60°. For analysis, the filters were sent to (a) the Sawyer Environmental Chemistry Laboratory at the University of Maine or to (b) the Department of Earth Sciences at Boston University. Filters were digested in a 5% nitric acid solution for 12 hours to dissolve all CaCO₃ and the solution was analyzed by ICP-AES (Inductively Couple Plasma – Atomic Emission Spectrometry) for Ca concentration. Filter and dissolution blanks were run as well as QC standards run with each batch of samples. The investigators also used the concentration of dissolved Na in the digestate to correct for any Ca present in sea salts left on the filter. PIC concentrations were calculated using the volumes of water filtered and the volume of the digestions, and assuming all Particulate Inorganic Carbon was in the form of CaCO₃.
4. Biogenic Silicas - To determine reactive silicate, 200 milliliters (mL) of seawater sample is filtered onto a 25 mm, 0.4um pore size polycarbonate filter. Filters are folded and placed in a super clear polypropylene centrifuge tube and dried in a drying oven at 60° Celsius (C) for 24 hours then tightly capped and stored until analysis. On shore, 0.2N NaOH is added and the sample is placed in a 95°C water bath. The digestions are then cooled and neutralized with 1N HCl. After centrifuging, the supernatant is transferred to a new tube and diluted with MilliQ water. Molybdate reagent is added and then a reducing agent is added to reduce silicomolybdate to silicomolybdous acid. The transmission at 810 nanometers (nm) is read on a Hitachi U-3010 spectrophotometer (SN 0947-010). Reactive silicate is calculated using a silicate standard solution standard curve prepared at least every 5 days or whenever new reagents are prepared. Readings are corrected using a reagent blank run at the same time as the standard curve and three tube blanks interspersed in each batch. References: Brzezinski & Nelson (1989); JGOFS (1996); Strickland & Parsons (1972).
5. Freon analysis - Sampling for the freons, CFC11 and CFC12, as well as analytical methods for their measurement were described previously (Bullister & Weiss, 1988; Bullister & Wisegarver, 2008), along with the equation of solubility of CFC11 and CFC12 as a function of temperature and salinity (Fine, 2011). A look-up table (Bullister, 2015) was used to convert CFC partial pressures measured in the Southern Hemispheric to the year of equilibration; the initial table covered up to the year 2015. The look-up table was extended to 2021 (M. Warner (Univ. Washington), personal communication).
6. Dissolved Inorganic Carbon and Total Alkalinity Measurements - The analytical method followed standardized protocols (Bates et al., 1996; Bates et al., 2001; Dickson et al., 2007; Knap et al., 1993). Samples for DIC and TA were collected in 250ml borosilicate glass bottles according to standard JGOFS methods. Milli‐Q cleaned bottles were rinsed out 3 times, bottom filled using silicone tubing, allowed to overflow at least 1X the bottle volume, ensuring no bubbles were in the sample and that it was sealed with a small headspace to allow for water expansion. Water samples were collected from all depths the CTD‐rosette sampled on full casts and from eight depths on the "trip‐on‐fly" casts. Two samples were collected from each Niskin bottle on the full casts. The first sample was poisoned with 100μl saturated mercuric chloride solution for analysis ashore. The second sample was not spiked and stored in the dark for no longer than 12 hours (to minimize any biological activity altering the sample) before being run aboard the ship, DIC first then TA. In addition to sampling from the rosette, samples were also collected and analyzed on board from the underway system. Both the underway and carboy samples were unpreserved, stored in the dark and analyzed on board the ship. Samples were processed at sea using a highly precise (0.02%; 0.4 millimoles per kilogram (mmoles kg-1)) VINDTA system (Bates, 2007; Bates et al., 1996; Bates & Peters, 2007). TA was measured on the VINDTA 3S by titration with a strong acid (HCl). The titration curve shows 2 inflection points, characterizing the protonation of carbonate and bicarbonate respectively, where consumption of acid at the second point is equal to the titration alkalinity. DIC was measured on the AIRICA by the extraction of total dissolved inorganic carbon content from the sample by phosphoric acid addition. The liberated CO₂ flowed with a N₂ carrier gas into a Li‐Cor non‐dispersive IR gas analyzer where the CO₂ levels were measured. For both instruments, within bottle replicates were run consecutively on start-up to check the precision, continuing once the instrument precision was ±2 micromoles per kilogram (μmol kg‐1) or better. These were followed by a combination of Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) produced by the Marine Physical Laboratory at UCSD and low nutrient surface water from the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series (BATS) site, which were run every 20‐24 samples on the VINDTA and every 6 samples on the AIRICA, to determine the accuracy and precision of the measurements and to correct for any discrepancies. The TA system CRM values did not vary more than 2 millimoles (mmol) within each batch of HCl acid. The AIRICA was more susceptible to drift and was affected by the lab temperature which is why CRMs were run much more often on the AIRICA, the system did not drift much and the lab temperature did not vary markedly. Both of the DIC and TA methods had a precision and accuracy of ~1 mmol kg-1 (precision estimates were determined from between-bottle and within-bottle replicates, and accuracy assessed using CRMs. The values for DIC and TA were used to calculate other parameters of the carbonate system using the software CO2sys (Lewis and Wallace, 1998). The calculated parameters were: pH, fCO₂, pCO₂, [HCO3‐], [CO3=], [CO2], alkalinity from borate; hydroxide ion; phosphate and silicate, Revelle Factor, plus the saturation states of calcite and aragonite.
7. Nutrients - Analyses of phosphate, silicate, nitrate+nitrite, nitrite, and ammonia were performed on a Seal Analytical continuous-flow AutoAnalyzer 3 (AA3). The methods used were described by Gordon et al. (1992), Hager et al. (1972), and Atlas et al. (1971). Details of modification of analytical methods used in this cruise are also compatible with the methods described in the nutrient section of the GO-SHIP repeat hydrography manual (Hydes et al., 2010).
8. Coccolithophore enumeration - Polarized microscopy was used to determine the concentration of coccolithophores and detached coccoliths in samples collected in the SW Pacific during the R/V Roger Revelle cruise from December 2020 to February 2021. A volume of 200mL was filtered onto 0.4μm-pore size, 25mm diameter polycarbonate filter and then processed according to Balch & Utgoff (2009).
9. Enumeration of major algal classes - A shipboard Yokogawa Fluid Imaging Technologies FlowCam imaging cytometer was used to enumerate the major microalgal classes and estimate the particle size distribution function. The instrument was keyed on particle backscattering and fluorescence properties. Samples were first filtered through 100um Nitex mesh to make sure the 100um diameter flow chamber did not clog. The instrument was run with a 10X objective in order to reliably count particles bigger than 4-5um diameter. Samples were processed according to Poulton and Martin (2010). Concentrations (per mL), percent contribution with respect to total particles, and biomass are presented. Carbon biomass was determined based on Menden-Deuer & Lessard (2000) method.
10. Primary Production and Calcification Carbon rates - Samples were also taken for measuring photosynthesis and calcification rates from 21 morning, full-CTD stations over the course of the trip (here called Productivity Stations). For these measurements, Niskin bottles were tripped at specific light depths throughout the euphotic zone (0.56%, 3.86%, 7.10%, 23.4%, 42.2% and 73.6%). During casts where there was sufficient light to measure PAR throughout the euphotic zone, these depths were calculated assuming a constant diffuse attenuation coefficient. For samples taken during the nighttime, estimation of those light depths was performed based on the assumption that the fluorescence maximum was located at the 1% light depth (Poulton et al., 2017). Water samples for incubation were transferred from Niskin bottles to incubation bottles, typically inside the ship's enclosed hanger, under subdued light conditions. Water samples were pre-filtered through 120mm nitex mesh to remove large grazers. Incubations were performed in 70 mL polystyrene tissue culture bottles that were previously acid-cleaned, rinsed with ethanol, reverse-osmosis water, then rinsed 5x with each sea water sample prior to filling. Photosynthesis and calcification were measured using the microdiffusion technique (Paasche & Brubak, 1994) with modifications by Balch et al. (2000) (see also Fabry (2010)). 14C bicarbonate (~30 mCi) was added for each water sample. Incubations were performed in triplicate (with an additional 2% buffered formalin sample (final concentration) used as a killed control) in simulated in situ conditions on-deck, corrected for both light quantity (extinction using bags made of neutral-density shade cloth) and quality (spectral narrowing) using blue acetate bag inserts. Bottle transfers between the incubators and radioisotope van were always done in darkened bags to avoid light shock to the phytoplankton. Deck incubators consisted of blue plastic tubs open to sky light, chilled using surface seawater from the ship's flowing seawater system. Calibration of those light levels in the bag were previously made using a Biospherical OSR2100 scalar PAR sensor inserted into each bag relative to a scalar PAR sensor outside the bag. All filtrations were performed using 0.4 mm pore-size polycarbonate filters. Following sample filtration, polycarbonate filters were rinsed three times with filtered seawater, then carefully given a "rim rinse" to make sure that all 14C-HCO3 in interstitial seawater in the filters was rinsed out. Filters and sample "boats" were placed in scintillation vials with 7mL of Ecolume scintillation cocktail. Samples were counted using a high-sensitivity Beckman Tricarb liquid scintillation counter with channel windows set for 14C counting. Counts were performed for sufficient time to reach 1% precision or 25 minutes for samples with lower counts. Blank 14C counts were always run for scintillation cocktail as well as the phenethylamine CO₂ absorbent. Standard equations were used for calculating primary production and calcification from the 14C counts with a 5% isotope discrimination factor assumed for the physiological fixation of 14C-HCO3 as opposed to 12C-HCO3. Specific intrinsic growth rates of organic matter were calculated by dividing daily photosynthetic carbon estimates by the concentration of POC. Carbon-specific intrinsic growth rates for PIC were calculated by dividing the calcification rate by the concentration of PIC.
Known Problems or Issues:
The investigators discovered the calcification blanks during the cruise had consistently higher DPMs than the photosynthesis blanks. They ran an extra experiment on the formalin blanks to see whether the buffer in the buffered formalin used to kill the cells, was causing the artificially high blanks. This experiment was performed using highly oligotrophic, 0.2mm filtered water found north of the Subtropical front in which there was no measurable phytoplankton fluorescence. The investigators filled 10 productivity bottles with this water, and added buffered formalin (buffered to pH 8.8) to half of them (leaving the other five bottles "live" despite the fact that all particles >0.2mm diameter had been filtered out), then incubated all bottles with 30uCi 14C bicarbonate in the dark for 24h. All 10 bottles were subsequently filtered onto 0.4um polycarbonate filters and subjected to the microdiffusion technique. The calcification blanks for the filtered, non-killed samples had radioactivity that was 46% lower than the blank samples "killed" with buffered formalin. Given the state of oligotrophy in the original water samples, and that they were incubated in darkness, the investigators conclude that the buffered formalin-killed calcification blanks caused a small chemical artifact. That is, that the buffer injected with the formalin into the incubation bottles was driving the carbonate equilibrium to precipitate a small amount of the 14C-bicarbonate, which was then caught on the filters for the killed blanks. For this reason, for all calcification blanks, the investigators subtracted the blank formalin values from filters that were acidified prior to counting (which drove off any residual 14C-carbonate precipitate (artifact) or residual 14C bicarbonate solution left in the interstices of filters).
- Imported original file "rr2004_masterData_v8 for BCO-DMO.csv" into the BCO-DMO system.
- Re-named fields to comply with BCO-DMO naming conventions.
- Removed the original "yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss" field, which was mostly empty.
- Created the ISO_Date_UTC column using the Month, Day, and Year fields as input.
- Saved the final data file as "907028_v1_rr2204_bottle.csv".
| File |
|---|
907028_v1_rr2204_bottle.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 1.36 MB) MD5:a6a329b9bb478f847ca87474b96fc8ba Primary data file for dataset ID 907028, version 1. |
| Parameter | Description | Units |
| Sample | unique sample number | unitless |
| Type | four types of sampling: CTD, EXP, NX, UW. CTD = discrete Niskin bottle samples from CTD cast; EXP = Carboy Experiment sampling; NX = Niskin X cast using trace metal-clean Niskin X bottles hung from Kevlar cable; UW = surface underway sample taken from ship's non-toxic seawater line. | unitless |
| Station | station number (between 1 and 103) | unitless |
| Event | sequential operation during station | unitless |
| Cast | sequential attempted sampling operation for a given event | unitless |
| Niskin | numbered Niskin bottle tripped on CTD casts | unitless |
| Trip_on_Fly | code for trip-on-fly cast: 0 if "no" and 1 if "yes" | unitless |
| Incubation | letter A-E designating results from each of five experiments | unitless |
| Timepoint | numbered sampling of carboy experiment | unitless |
| Elapsed_Time_hours | number of hours after start of carboy incubation | hours |
| Treatment | description of carboy treatment | unitless |
| Cubitainer | number of incubation cubitainer | unitless |
| Underway_Number | unique number of underway sample | unitless |
| Salinometer_Sample_Number | sequentially numbered salinometer sample | unitless |
| Lab_O2_Sample_Number | sequentially numbered oxygen sample for Winkler titration O2 sample | unitless |
| Nutrient_Sample_Number | sequentially numbered nutrient sample number | unitless |
| CTD_Sample_Number | sequentially numbered CTD sample | unitless |
| Balch_Sample_Number | sequentially numbered sample from Balch lab | unitless |
| Freon_Sample_Number | sequentially numbered freon sample number | unitless |
| Month | number month of year | unitless |
| Day | number day of month | unitless |
| Year | year | unitless |
| Trip_Time | time (GMT) bottle tripped | unitless |
| Latitude | decimal degrees of latitude of sample location, negative values = South | degrees North |
| Longitude | decimal degrees of longitude of sample location; negative values = West | degrees East |
| Sal00 | salinity of water sample as estimated by conductivity probe 0 | PSU (Practical Salinity Units) |
| Sal11 | salinity of water sample as estimated by conductivity probe 1 | PSU (Practical Salinity Units) |
| Sigma_E900 | density anomaly of seawater calculated from salinity derived from conductivity probe 0 | metric tonnes per cubic meter |
| Sigma_E911 | density anomaly of seawater calculated from salinity derived from conductivity probe 1 | metric tonnes per cubic meter |
| Sbeox0_mL_per_L | Oxygen concentration derived from Sea Bird oxygen probe on CTD | milliliters per liter (mL L-1) |
| Oxsol_mL_per_L | Estimated 100%-saturated concentration of oxygen for given temperature and salinity conditions | milliliters per liter (mL L-1) |
| Bottle_O2_Flag | possible suspect bottle oxygen datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 =no flag; 1=flag | unitless |
| Potemp090C | Potential temperature ITS-90 (primary temperature probe) | degrees Celsius |
| Potemp190C | Potential temperature ITS-90 (secondary temperature probe) | degrees Celsius |
| SvCM | Sound Velocity [Chen-Millero 1977] based on temperature & salinity probes #1 | meters per second (m/s) |
| SvCM1 | Sound Velocity [Chen-Millero 1977] based on temperature & salinity probes #2 | meters per second (m/s) |
| PrDM | water pressure | decibars |
| Depth_m | water depth | meters |
| T090C | CTD temperature (ITS-90) probe 1 | degrees Celsius |
| T190C | CTD temperature (ITS-90) probe 2 | degrees Celsius |
| C0_S_per_m | Conductivity based on conductivity probe 0 | Siemens per meter (S/m) |
| C1_S_per_m | Conductivity based on conductivity probe 1 | Siemens per meter (S/m) |
| Sbeox0V | SeaBird oxygen probe 0 | volts |
| FlECO_AFL | Chlorophyll Fluorescence; WET Labs ECO-AFL/FL sensor 0 | Volts DC |
| FlECO_AFL1 | Chlorophyll Fluorescence; WET Labs ECO-AFL/FL sensor 1 | Volts DC |
| CStarTr0 | Beam transmission WetLabs Cstar | percent |
| TurbWETbb0 | Turbidity; WET Labs ECO BB | per meter (m-1) |
| Par | Photosynthetically Available Radiation measured at depth | microEinsteins per square centimeter per second (uE/(cm2·sec)) |
| Spar | Surface photosynthetically available radiation measured at the surface | microEinsteins per square centimeter per second (uE/(cm2·sec)) |
| Cpar | fraction of photosynthetically available radiation measured at depth | percent |
| V5_WET_Labs_ECO_BB_Volts | backscattering measured with a WET Labs ECO-BB | volts |
| Scan | number of the CTD scan in which measurements were made | unitless |
| Lab_Salinity | lab-derived salinity | PSU (Practical Salinity Units) |
| Lab_Salinity_Flag | possible suspect lab salinity datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| Lab_O2__mL_per_L | Oxygen concentration | milliliters per liter (mL/L) |
| Lab_O2_Flag | possible suspect oxygen datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| NO3_umol_per_L | concentration of nitrate | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| PO4_umol_per_L | concentration of phosphate | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| SIL_umol_per_L | concentration of silicate | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| NO2_umol_per_L | concentration of nitrite | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| NH4_umol_per_L | concentration of ammonia | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| Nutrient_Flag | possible suspect nutrient sample datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| POC_ug_per_L | concentration of particulate organic carbon | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| POC_Flag | possible suspect POC datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| PON_ug_per_L | concentration of particulate organic nitrogen | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| POC_umol_per_L | concentration of particulate organic carbon | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| PON_umol_per_L | concentration of particulate organic nitrogen | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| PON_Flag | possible suspect PON datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| PIC_umol_per_L | concentration of particulate inorganic carbon | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| PIC_ug_per_L | concentration of particulate inorganic carbon | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| PIC_mol_per_cubic_m | concentration of particulate inorganic carbon | moles per cubic meter (mol/m3) |
| PIC_Flag | possible suspect PIC datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| Single_Lith_count_per_mL | concentration of birefringent particles-singlets | numbers per milliliter (mL) |
| Double_Lith_count_per_mL | concentration of birefringent particles-doublets | numbers per milliliter (mL) |
| Triple_Lith_count_per_mL | concentration of birefringent particles-triplets | numbers per milliliter (mL) |
| Quadruple_Lith_count_per_mL | concentration of birefringent particles-quadruplets | numbers per milliliter (mL) |
| Tot_Lith_count_per_mL | concentration of birefringent particles-all | numbers per milliliter (mL) |
| Cell_plus_Agg_count_per_mL | concentration of birefringent plated cells; coccospheres and aggregates | numbers per milliliter (mL) |
| Lith_Area_square_um_per_mL | total area subtended by by detached coccoliths | square micrometers per milliliter (um^2 per mL) |
| Cell_plus_Agg_Area_square_um_per_mL | total area subtended by by plated coccolithophores; coccospheres and aggregates | square micrometers per milliliter (um^2 per mL) |
| Cell_Count_Flag | possible suspect cell count datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| BSi_umol_per_L | concentration of biogenic silica | micromoles per liter (umoles/L) |
| BSi_Flag | possible suspect biogenic silica datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| Avg_Corr_Chl_a_ug_per_L | concentration of chlorophyll a | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Avg_Corr_Phaeo_ug_per_L | concentration of phaeopigments | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Avg_Corr_Chl_a_plus_Phaeo_ug_per_L | concentration of chlorophyll a plus phaeopigments | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Chl_Flag | possible suspect chlorophyll datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| PSD_Slope_logABD_grthan_point_75 | PDF Slope logABD>0.75 (only particles >5um); Particle size Distribution Function slope of the plot of log cell abundance (particles per mL) versus Area Based Diameter (micrometers) calculated for particles of >5 micrometers diameter using a Yokogowa FlowCAM. Area Based Diameter (ABD) is defined as the diameter measured by the number of grey scale pixels of the binary image converted to a circle with the same number of pixels | unitless |
| Std_Err_of_PSD_Slope_logABD_grthan_point_75 | Std Err of PDF Slope logABD>0.75 (for particles >5um); Standard error of the above particle size distribution slope for only particles of 5 micrometers diameter or larger using a Yokogowa FlowCAM | unitless |
| Y_int_of_PSD_Slope_logABD_grthan_point_75 | Y-int of PDF Slope logABD>0.75 (only particles >5um); the Y intercept of above PDF for only particles of ~5um diameter or larger using a Yokogowa FlowCAM | unitless |
| R2of_PSD_Slope_logABD_grthan_point_75 | R-squared value of PDF Slope logABD>0.75(only particles >5um); squared correlation coefficient of above PDF for only particles of >5um diameter or larger using a Yokogowa FlowCAM | unitless |
| F_statistic_of_PSD_Slope_logABD_grthan_point_75 | F-statistic of PDF Slope logABD>0.75 (only particles >5um); the F statistic of of above PDF for only particles of >5um diameter or larger using a Yokogowa FlowCAM | unitless |
| Total_cells_per_mL | Concentration of total particles measured by Yokogowa measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Small_0_4um_cells_per_mL | Concentration of small particles with diameters of 0 to 4 micrometers measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Round_4_12um_cells_per_mL | Concentration of round particles with diameters of 4 to 12 micrometers measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Ovoid_4_12um_cells_per_mL | Concentration of ovoid particles with diameters of 4 to 12 micrometers measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Dinoflagellates_cells_per_mL | Concentration of dinoflagellates measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Ciliates_cells_per_mL | Concentration of ciliates measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Diatoms_cells_per_mL | Concentration of diatoms measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Silicoflagellates_cells_per_mL | Concentration of silicoflagellates measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Other_Cells_cells_per_mL | Concentration of other unidentified cells as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | cells per milliliter (cells/mL) |
| Small_0_4um_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by small (0-4 um) particles as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Round_4_12um_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by round (4-12 um) particles as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Ovoid_4_12um_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by ovoid (4-12 um) particles as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Dinoflagellates_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by dinoflagellates as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Ciliates_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by ciliates as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Diatoms_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by diatoms as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Silicoflagellates_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by silicoflagellates as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Other_Cells_pcnt | Percent of total particles contributed by unidentified other cells as measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | unitless |
| Total_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Total carbon biomass (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Small_0_4um_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of small 0-4um cells (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Round_4_12um_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of round 4-12um cells (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Ovoid_4_12um_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of ovoid 4-12um cells (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Dinoflagellates_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of dinoflagellates (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Ciliates_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of ciliates (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Diatoms_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of diatoms (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Silicoflagellates_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of silicoflagellates (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Other_Cells_C_Biomass_Menden_Deuer_ug_per_L | Carbon biomass of unidentified other cells (based on Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000) for total particles measured by Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Flowcam_Flag | possible suspect FlowCAM datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| Psy_Avg_C_to_P | Ratio of calcification to photosynthesis | unitless |
| Psy_Avg_P | Average photosynthesis rate | micromoles Carbon per liter per day (umol C/L/d) |
| Psy_Avg_C | Average calcification rate | micromoles Carbon per liter per day (umol C/L/d) |
| Psy_P_SD | standard deviation of photosynthesis rate | micromoles Carbon per liter per day (umol C/L/d) |
| Psy_C_SD | standard deviation of calcification rate | micromoles Carbon per liter per day (umol C/L/d) |
| Psy_Avg_Chl_a_ug_per_L | chlorophyll concentration in productivity sample | micrograms per liter (ug/L) |
| Psy_Avg_Pmb_ug_C_per_ug_chl_d | chlorophyll-normalized primary production rate | micrograms Carbon per micrograms chlorophyll per day (ugC/ugchl/d) |
| Psy_Avg_Cmb_ug_C_per_ug_chl_d | chlorophyll-normalized calcification rate | micrograms Carbon per micrograms chlorophyll per day (ugC/ugchl/d) |
| Psy_Flag | possible suspect productivity or calcification datum as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| Freon_Flag | possible suspect freon sample as indicated by analist for various reasons; 0 = no flag; 1 = flag | unitless |
| Sal_corrected | salinity corrected for bottle salinity measured aboard ship | PSU (Practical Salinity Units) |
| Sbeox_corrected_mL_per_L | Seabird oxygen concentration corrected for lab oxygen concentration measured aboard ship | milliliters per liter (mL/L) |
| DIC_umol_per_kg | dissolved inorganic carbon concentration | micromoles per kilogram (umol/kg) |
| TA_umol_per_kg | Total akalinity | micromoles per kilogram (umol/kg) |
| F12_pM | concentration of CFC-12 | picomolar (pM) |
| F11_pM | concentration of CFC-11 | picomolar (pM) |
| ISO_Date_UTC | Date (UTC) in ISO 8601 format | unitless |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | VINDTA 3S |
| Generic Instrument Name | Automatic titrator |
| Generic Instrument Description | Instruments that incrementally add quantified aliquots of a reagent to a sample until the end-point of a chemical reaction is reached. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Biospherical OSR2100 scalar PAR sensor |
| Generic Instrument Name | Biospherical PAR sensor |
| Generic Instrument Description | An irradiance sensor designed to measure Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR), manufactured by Biospherical Instruments Inc. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | CTD Sea-Bird SBE911plus |
| Generic Instrument Name | CTD Sea-Bird SBE 911plus |
| Generic Instrument Description | The Sea-Bird SBE 911 plus is a type of CTD instrument package for continuous measurement of conductivity, temperature and pressure. The SBE 911 plus includes the SBE 9plus Underwater Unit and the SBE 11plus Deck Unit (for real-time readout using conductive wire) for deployment from a vessel. The combination of the SBE 9 plus and SBE 11 plus is called a SBE 911 plus. The SBE 9 plus uses Sea-Bird's standard modular temperature and conductivity sensors (SBE 3 plus and SBE 4). The SBE 9 plus CTD can be configured with up to eight auxiliary sensors to measure other parameters including dissolved oxygen, pH, turbidity, fluorescence, light (PAR), light transmission, etc.). more information from Sea-Bird Electronics |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II CHNS/O |
| Generic Instrument Name | Elemental Analyzer |
| Generic Instrument Description | Instruments that quantify carbon, nitrogen and sometimes other elements by combusting the sample at very high temperature and assaying the resulting gaseous oxides. Usually used for samples including organic material. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Li‐Cor non‐dispersive IR gas analyzer |
| Generic Instrument Name | Gas Analyzer |
| Generic Instrument Description | Gas Analyzers - Instruments for determining the qualitative and quantitative composition of gas mixtures. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | ICP-AES (Inductively Couple Plasma - Atomic Emission Spectrometry) |
| Generic Instrument Name | Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer |
| Generic Instrument Description | Also referred to as an Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscope (ICP-AES). These instruments pass nebulised samples into an inductively-coupled gas plasma (8-10000 K) where they are atomised and excited. The de-excitation optical emissions at characteristic wavelengths are spectroscopically analysed. It is often used in the detection of trace metals. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Beckman Tricarb liquid scintillation counter |
| Generic Instrument Name | Liquid Scintillation Counter |
| Generic Instrument Description | Liquid scintillation counting is an analytical technique which is defined by the incorporation of the radiolabeled analyte into uniform distribution with a liquid chemical medium capable of converting the kinetic energy of nuclear emissions into light energy. Although the liquid scintillation counter is a sophisticated laboratory counting system used the quantify the activity of particulate emitting (ß and a) radioactive samples, it can also detect the auger electrons emitted from 51Cr and 125I samples.
Liquid scintillation counters are instruments assaying alpha and beta radiation by quantitative detection of visible light produced by the passage of rays or particles through a suitable scintillant incorporated into the sample. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Polarized microscopy |
| Generic Instrument Name | Microscope - Optical |
| Generic Instrument Description | Instruments that generate enlarged images of samples using the phenomena of reflection and absorption of visible light. Includes conventional and inverted instruments. Also called a "light microscope". |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Niskin-X and 10L Niskin bottles |
| Generic Instrument Name | Niskin bottle |
| Generic Instrument Description | A Niskin bottle (a next generation water sampler based on the Nansen bottle) is a cylindrical, non-metallic water collection device with stoppers at both ends. The bottles can be attached individually on a hydrowire or deployed in 12, 24, or 36 bottle Rosette systems mounted on a frame and combined with a CTD. Niskin bottles are used to collect discrete water samples for a range of measurements including pigments, nutrients, plankton, etc. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Seal Analytical continuous-flow AutoAnalyzer 3 (AA3) |
| Generic Instrument Name | Nutrient Autoanalyzer |
| Generic Instrument Description | Nutrient Autoanalyzer is a generic term used when specific type, make and model were not specified. In general, a Nutrient Autoanalyzer is an automated flow-thru system for doing nutrient analysis (nitrate, ammonium, orthophosphate, and silicate) on seawater samples. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | incubation bottles, deck incubators |
| Generic Instrument Name | Shipboard Incubator |
| Generic Instrument Description | A device mounted on a ship that holds water samples under conditions of controlled temperature or controlled temperature and illumination. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Hitachi U-3010 spectrophotometer (SN 0947-010) |
| Generic Instrument Name | Spectrophotometer |
| Generic Instrument Description | An instrument used to measure the relative absorption of electromagnetic radiation of different wavelengths in the near infra-red, visible and ultraviolet wavebands by samples. |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Turner Designs 10AU fluorometer |
| Generic Instrument Name | Turner Designs Fluorometer 10-AU |
| Generic Instrument Description | The Turner Designs 10-AU Field Fluorometer is used to measure Chlorophyll fluorescence. The 10AU Fluorometer can be set up for continuous-flow monitoring or discrete sample analyses. A variety of compounds can be measured using application-specific optical filters available from the manufacturer. (read more from Turner Designs, turnerdesigns.com, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) |
| Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Yokogowa FlowCAM imaging cytometer |
| Generic Instrument Name | Yokogawa Fluid Imaging Technologies FlowCam VS particle imaging system |
| Generic Instrument Description | Imaging cytometers are automated instruments that quantify properties of single cells, one cell at a time. They combine some aspects of flow cytometry with particle imaging capabilities in an automated device to classify small particles, including phytoplankton and protozoa. They can measure a variety of properties: cell size, cell granularity, cell aspect ratio, equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) and area-based diameter (ABD) [to estimate bio-volume, which is used to estimate cell carbon biomass]. Particle images are digitally recorded and sorted into different classes according to training libraries using a support vector machine (supervised learning methods). The instruments particle-size is calibrated using different sizes of latex beads.
The FlowCam VS series are automated imaging-in-flow instruments that generate high-resolution digital images for measuring size and shape of microscopic particles. The sample introduced in the system is attracted by a peristaltic or a syringe pump into a flow cell (or flow chamber) with known dimensions, located in front of a microscope objective which is connected to a camera video. The benchtop model is ideally suited to a typical laboratory environment with applications in oceanographic research, municipal water, biopharmaceutical formulations, chemicals, oil and gas, biofuels, and many other markets. FlowCam VS is available in four models, from the imaging-only VS-I (i.e. without excitation wavelength or fluorescence emission wavelengths) to the top-of-the-line VS-IV with two channels of fluorescence measurement and scatter triggering capabilities. The instrument can measure particles between 2µm and 2mm; can analyse in vivo or fixed samples; has a flow rate between 0.005 ml/minute and 250 ml/minute (dependant upon magnification, flow cell depth, camera frame rate, efficiency desired, etc.). It can produce either 8-bit Grayscale (Monochrome Camera) or 24-bit Colour (Colour Camera) images, depending on the model. |
| Website | |
| Platform | R/V Roger Revelle |
| Start Date | 2020-12-26 |
| End Date | 2021-02-23 |
| Description | See more information at R2R: https://www.rvdata.us/search/cruise/RR2004
Description of Cruise (provided by Chief Scientist Barney Balch):
This cruise departed Honolulu, Hawaii on 26 December 2020 (following two weeks of strict quarantine/isolation for Covid plus 4 days of loading of the ship within the Revelle's Covid "bubble"). The ship transited south along the great circle route from Honolulu to 30°S x 150°W. We targeted this meridian for several reasons. First, Sub-Antarctic Mode Water (SAMW) is formed in the Southern Ocean at high rates in the vicinity of this meridian (Cerovečki et al., 2013). This water is subsequently subducted and gets carried northward at depths of 500-700 meters (m), where it is brought closer to the surface in about 40 years' time in the equatorial regions, influencing the productivity of these waters as well as those further into the northern hemisphere (Sarmiento et al., 2004). Second, ocean color satellite data over the last 23 years has shown elevated reflectance from the Great Calcite Belt between the latitudes of 40°S to 50°S but this region is extremely remote and few actual observations exist to confirm this (Balch et al., 2016). Third, ocean color imagery has also revealed regions of elevated coccolithophore-like reflectance further south than 50°S latitude along this meridian, but these waters have temperatures well below the preferred temperature range of the common coccolithophore species of the Southern Ocean, Emiliana huxleyi, hence we suspected another particle type likely is responsible. There is strong topographic steering of the currents along the subantarctic front, the polar front, and the southern Antarctic Circumpolar current by the Pacific Antarctic Ridge and its associated Udintsev and Eltanin Fracture Zones. Fourth, this region has elevated frequencies of eddy formation, with trapped high-reflectance waters, which provide opportunities to follow these semi-enclosed parcels and their trapped populations in space and time. A meridional transect along 150°W provided an opportunity to track the formation of SAMW and its age using Freon measurements (to be performed ashore by the laboratory of Dr. Rana Fine (Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Miami, FL) (Fine, 1993, 2011; Fine et al., 2002; Fine et al., 2008). Knowing the age of SAMW allows determination of the rates that SAMW is being conditioned by diatoms, coccolithophores, and other classes of phytoplankton on its trek to the north.
We began the meridional transect (with CTD casts at 0.5° latitude resolution at 30°S-47°S), and we switched to a higher resolution of sampling from 47°S to 60°S (so-called "enhanced" meridional transect at 0.33° latitude resolution), plus the addition of Video Plankton Recorder (VPR) tows, in order to better define mesoscale features that we encountered (with both satellite and ship data) along the 150°W meridian. The enhanced meridional transect was done in 180-240 nautical mile segments along 150°W, which allowed for more flexible scheduling of the VPR transects during good weather days, allowing safer VPR deployment and recovery, whereas the CTD stations could be performed safely on the many more inclement days with higher sea states when the VPR could not be deployed safely. Five carboy experiments were performed during the trip to investigate factors limiting to the phytoplankton production.
After completion of the meridional transect (both reduced-resolution and enhanced resolution), we headed east for the first crossing of the polar front which was shown through altimetry to be topographically-steered through the Udintsev Fracture Zone. Moreover, satellite remote sensing of this feature showed it to be of high reflectance. After crossing the Polar Front the first time, we surveyed a mesoscale eddy that contained waters with elevated reflectance around the edge (hereafter referred to as "Eddy A") performing two radial surveys with complete VPR and hydrographic sections. Two productivity and trace-metal casts were performed in Eddy A along with a carboy experiment, as well. The ship then transited south and east to perform a cross frontal VPR and hydrographic survey (which crossed the same polar frontal boundary crossed earlier during the meridional transect, as well as during the transit to Eddy A; this transect was called the "Cross Frontal Transect").
At this point of the cruise, French Polynesia announced that the ports in Tahiti would be closed for the ship to disembark scientists at the end of February. This meant that the ship would have to return to Honolulu at cruise end, which, in turn, meant that we would lose about one week of science time for the long transit back to Honolulu. Therefore, we devised a streamlined cruise plan for the remainder of the cruise in order to achieve all of our objectives. The ship then visited a small mesoscale eddy (Eddy C) which contained a highly focused, high-reflectance core that we had observed in satellite imagery for several weeks. We performed one VPR tow and one hydrographic survey along one diameter across the small eddy and left Eddy C with VPR in tow, to do a repeat crossing of Eddy A, then onward to a high-reflectance meander of the SubAntarctic Front for collection of water for the fourth experiment and documentation of the conditions of the SAF. We then headed for the portion of the meridional survey where we had seen low levels of coccolithophores three weeks prior. This region had remained cloud-covered for weeks, thus we had little idea of what awaited us. Shortly after leaving the Meander station, the estimates of acid-labile backscattering (an optical proxy for PIC) began rising and for the next 400 nautical miles saw PIC concentrations three times higher than anything we had seen previously along the 150°W meridian (or elsewhere for that matter).
References:
Fine, R. A. (2011), Observations of CFCs and SF 6 as ocean tracers, Annual Review of Marine Science, 3, 173-195, doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163933. |
NSF Award Abstract:
Cold surface water in the southern Indian Ocean sinks to about 500 meters and travels in the dark for thousands of miles before it resurfaces some 40 years later near the equator in the other ocean basins. This major water mass is named the Sub-Antarctic Mode Water (SAMW). Nutrients it contains when it warms and rises into the sunlit subtropical and tropical waters are estimated to fuel up to 75% of the microscopic plant growth there. Before it sinks, the chemical properties of the SAMW are modified by the growth and distinct physiology of two common phytoplankton; diatoms with shells made of silica, and coccolithophores with carbonate shells. Local physical dynamics influence where and how fast these two phytoplankton classes grow. Consequently, differing nutrient and trace chemical fingerprints are established at the point of SAMW formation. This project is an exceptionally detailed field and modeling effort that will document and quantify the remarkable, interconnected processes that chemically connect two important oceanic ecosystems half a world apart. The scientists leading the project will study the complexity of the biological and chemical conditioning of the SAMW and thus provide critical data about the large-scale oceanic controls of the biological carbon pump that removes atmospheric carbon dioxide to the deep ocean over millennial timescales. Scientific impact from this project will stem from significant peer-reviewed publications and improved predictive models. Societal benefits will develop from training of a range of scholars, including high school, undergraduate, and graduate students, as well as technical and post-doctoral participants. A high school teacher and science communication specialist will go to sea with the project and share experiences from the ship with students on shore via social media and scheduled web interactions.
To examine how SAMW formation and subduction controls the productivity of global waters well to the north, two January expeditions to the SE Indian Ocean will identify, track, and study the unique mesoscale eddies that serve as discrete water parcels supporting rich populations of either coccolithophores or diatoms plus their associated microbial communities. The eddies will be tracked with Lagrangian Argo drifters and observations will be made of exactly how SAMW is chemically conditioned (i.e. Si, N, P, Fe, and carbonate chemistry) over time scales of months. Using data obtained on the feedback between ecological processes and nutrient, trace metal, and carbonate chemistry in these eddies and on related transect cruises, the project will have three main goals: (1) determine the rates at which SAMW coccolithophores and diatoms condition the carbonate chemistry plus nutrient and trace metal concentrations, as well as assess taxonomic and physiological diversity in the study area with traditional methods plus next-generation sequence DNA/RNA profiling, (2) explore growth limitations by iron, silicate and/or nitrate in controlling algal assemblages and genetic diversity, and (3) combine these findings with the Ekman- and eddy-driven subduction of SAMW to examine biogeochemical impact on a basin scale, using both observations and global numerical models. A meridional survey from 30 to 60 degrees south latitude will be used to characterize the larger-scale variability of carbonate chemistry, nutrient distributions, productivity, genetics and biomass of various plankton groups as SAMW is subducted and proceeds northward.