Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Bundy, Randelle M. | University of Washington (UW) | Principal Investigator, Contact |
Resing, Joseph A. | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA-PMEL) | Principal Investigator |
Buck, Nathan | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA-PMEL) | Scientist |
Moore, Laura | University of Washington (UW) | Student |
Soenen, Karen | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Seawater collection
Seawater was collected using 10 L Teflon-coated GO-Flo bottles (General Oceanics) with the U.S. GEOTRACES trace metal rosette sampling system (Cutter and Bruland, 2012). The rosette was additionally outfitted with a miniature autonomous plume recorder (MAPR; (Baker, 1997) which included an oxidation reduction potential (ORP) and light scattering sensors, and an ultra-short baseline (USBL) transponder to ensure precise site locations on repeat casts. Two bottles were tripped at every depth to ensure adequate volumes of seawater were obtained for sample analysis. Samples were taken for dissolved gases, total dissolvable Fe (dtFe) and total dissolvable Mn (tdMn), dissolved Fe (dFe) and dissolved Mn (dMn), and total suspended particle analysis, all of which were sampled from even numbered bottles. All cleaning and sampling procedures were done according to GEOTRACES cookbook protocols (Cutter et al., 2017; Cutter and Bruland, 2012).
Dissolved and total dissolvable iron and manganese analyses
All samples for tdFe, dFe, tdMn, and dMn were measured shipboard using flow injection analysis (FIA) and analyzed within 6-8 hours of sample collection. The dFe, tdFe, dMn, and tdMn samples were measured using direct injection FIA with spectrophotometric detection modified from (Measures et al., 1995) and detailed in (Sedwick et al., 2008) for Fe and from (Resing and Mottl, 1992) for Mn. Detection limits for Mn and Fe were 1 nM and 1.5 nM, respectively.
Organic iron-binding ligand analyses
Samples for dFe-binding organic ligands were measured using competitive ligand exchange adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-ACSV) (Abualhaija and van den Berg, 2014; Rue and Bruland, 1995). All titrations were performed on a controlled growth mercury electrode (CGME, Bioanalytical Systems Incorporated) equipped with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode and platinum auxiliary electrode, with a mercury drop size of 14 and acid-cleaned Teflon analytical cell (Bioanalytical Systems Incorporated). Samples for which dFe concentrations were less than 10 nM were first analyzed using the forward titration method using a 5 µM salicyladoxime analytical window (Abualhaija and van den Berg, 2014). Briefly, samples were thawed, and 10 mL were aliquoted into each of 15 acid-cleaned and conditioned Teflon vials (Savillex Corporation). Then 10 µL of 1.5 M boric acid buffer (boric acid, Alfa Aesar 99.99% metals basis, in 0.4 N Optima NH4OH, Fisher Scientific) was added to each vial for a final concentration of 5 µM to achieve a pH of 8.2. Next 12.5 µL of 4M salicylaldoxime (Fluka > 98% assay in Optima MeOH, Fisher Scientific) was then added to each vial for a final concentration of 5µM. The dFe standards (Diluted from SpexCertiPrep in pH 2 HCl) were then added to each vial, ranging 0-10 nM for final concentrations. Aliquots were then equilibrated overnight prior to electrochemical analysis using differential pulse stripping voltammetry (0 to -800 mV), with a 120-180s deposition period with stirring at 0 mV. After the final aliquot was analyzed, 5 nM of dFe standard was added and the aliquot was re-measured to ensure complete titration of the ligands. Peak heights were obtained using ECD-Soft and ligand concentrations and binding strengths were calculated using ProMCC (Omanović et al., 2015) with an inorganic side reaction coefficient of logαFe′ = 10 (Abualhaija and van den Berg, 2014).
For samples where forward titrations showed no curvature, indicating excess ligands were present, or in the case where dFe in the sample was > 10 nM, reverse titrations were completed, employing 1-nitroso-2-naphthol (NN) as the competing ligand. The procedure and theory are described in detail elsewhere (Hawkes et al., 2013). Briefly, samples were thawed and 10 mL were aliquoted into 10 acid-cleaned and conditioned Teflon vials (Savillex Corporation). Then 10 µL of boric acid buffer was added to each vial for a final concentration of 5 µM and pH of 8.2. The NN standard (Sigma Aldrich) was prepared in methanol (Optima, Fisher Scientific) and was then added to each vial to achieve final concentrations ranging 0-40 µM, and aliquots were left to equilibrate overnight. After equilibration, samples were analyzed electrochemically using linear sweep voltammetry (-150 to -650 mV) after a 5-minute nitrogen purge (ultra high purity, Airgas) and a 120 s deposition time at -50 mV. Three standard additions of dFe standard were added to the final aliquot and analyzed to calculate the amount of dFe that was exchangeable with NN under the analytical conditions. The estimates of exchangeable dFe often exceeded the ambient dFe concentrations in the samples. In these cases, all ambient dFe was assumed to be exchangeable. Peak heights were obtained using ECD-Soft, and ligand concentrations and binding strengths were calculated using publicly available R code (Hawkes et al., 2013) with the unsaturated Fe fit with logαFe′ = 9.8 as the inorganic side reaction coefficient.
Siderophore analyses
At sea, four liters of 0.2 µm filtered seawater (Acropak 200, Pall Corporation) were collected for siderophore analyses. Prior to solid phase extraction, columns were activated with 2 column volumes of ultrapure methanol (Fisher, Optima grade) and rinsed with 2 column volumes of ultrapure Milli-Q water. Filtered seawater samples were then pumped continuously (~15-18 mL min-1) onto a Bond Elut solid phase extraction column (1g ENV, 6 mL, Agilent Technologies). After solid phase extraction, columns were again rinsed with at least 2 column volumes of Milli-Q water to flush remaining sea salts then stored frozen at -20ºC prior to analysis. In the laboratory, columns were thawed in the dark at room temperature and then rinsed with 2 column volumes of Milli-Q water to remove any additional salts. Columns were then eluted with 12 mL ultrapure methanol into 15 mL acid-washed and methanol-rinsed falcon tubes. Eluent was then concentrated to ~0.5 mL on a vacuum concentrator with a refrigerated vapor trap (SpeedVac, Thermo Scientific) and transferred to clean 2 mL low density polyethylene vials. Extracts were weighed to determine exact volumes then frozen at -20ºC until analysis.
Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) and an electrospray ionization mass spectrometer (ESI-MS). For each analysis, 100 µL of sample was combined with a spike of 15 µL of 5 µM cyanocobalamin internal standard then injected and separated using a Dionex 3000 LC system equipped with a ZORBAX-SB C18 trap column (0.5x35 mm, 3.5µm, Agilent technologies) and a ZORBBAX-SB C18 working column (0.5x150 mm, 5 µm, Agilent technologies) after the method of (Li et al., 2021). For each sample, a 62.5 µL injection was loaded onto the trap column at 25 µL/min with a 5-minute isocratic elution of solvent C (5% Optima methanol in 95% Milli-Q water, with 5 mM ammonium formate). Samples were then separated on working column using a flow rate of 40 µL/min at 30ºC beginning with a 5-minute isocratic elution of 95% solvent A (Milli-Q water with 5 mM ammonium formate) and 5% solvent B (Optima methanol with 5 mM ammonium formate buffer) followed by a 20 minute gradient from 95% solvent A to 90% solvent B, then a 10-minute isocratic elution at 90% solvent B, followed by a 5 minute gradient from 90% solvent B to 95% solvent B, then a 5-minute isocratic elution at 95% solvent B and a 13 minute conditioning step at 5% solvent B prior to the next injection. The same chromatography structure was used for both LC-ICP-MS and LC-ESI-MS (Boiteau et al., 2016; Bundy et al., 2018; Park et al., 2023).
Samples were introduced from the LC to the ICP-MS (iCAP-RQ; Thermo Scientific) via a PFA-ST nebulizer (Elemental Scientific) and spray chamber cooled to 2.7ºC. The ICP-MS was equipped with platinum sample and skimmer cones and a 10% oxygen flow was added to the sample chamber to prevent organic matter precipitation on the cones. Analyses were made in kinetic energy discrimination (KED) mode with a helium collision flow rate of 4.0-4.2 mL/min. 56Fe peaks were identified using an in-house R code with a peak threshold of 700 counts above the large background of non-chromatographically resolved dFe-binding organic matter. All identified 56Fe peaks were considered putative siderophores. Putative siderophore concentrations were calculated using a standard curve of ferrioxamine E (25-200 nM) (Boiteau et al., 2016; Bundy et al., 2018; Park et al., 2023). A 50 nM ferrioxamine E standard followed by a MilliQ blank were analyzed every six samples to adjust for instrument drift and ensure minimal carryover between samples.
Organic iron-binding ligands
Peak heights were obtained using ECD-Soft, and ligand concentrations and binding strengths were calculated using publicly available R code (Hawkes et al., 2013) with the unsaturated Fe fit with logαFe′ = 9.8 as the inorganic side reaction coefficient.
* adjusted parameter names to comply with database requirements
* added ISO_DateTime_UTC to dataset
* Added flags (under detection limit) as separate column to preserve numeric column formats. Changed flag BDL (1 occurrence) to ND for consistency (in column dMn_nM_flag).
Parameter | Description | Units |
GT_number | geotraces number for each sample | unitless |
Cruise | cruise name | unitless |
Station | station name | unitless |
Cast_number | cast number | unitless |
Rosette | rosette type, either trace metal or hydrothermal (regular CTD) | unitless |
Site_Name | name of each process study site | unitless |
Station_ID | extended number assocaited with each station (needed for NOAA) | unitless |
Bottle_Position | bottle position on rosette | unitless |
Nisken_number | Niskin bottle number | unitless |
Date | date | unitless |
Time_GMT | time | unitless |
ISO_DateTime_UTC | Date Time in ISO format (UTC timzone) | unitless |
Pressure_dbar | pressure | dbars |
Depth_m | depth | meters |
Temp_degC | temperature | degrees celsius |
Salinity_PSU | salinty | psu |
Sigma_Theta_kg_m3 | density | kg/m3 |
ORP_mv | oxidation reduction potential | millivolts |
Longitude | longitude, west is negative | decimal degrees |
Latitude | latitude, south is negative | decimal degrees |
tFe_nM | total dissolvable iron | nanomolar |
dFe_nM | dissolved iron | nanomolar |
dFe_nM_flag | flag for dissolved iron: ND = below detection limit | unitless |
tMn_nM | total dissolvable manganese | nanomolar |
tMn_nM_flag | flag for otal dissolvable manganese: ND = below detection limit | unitless |
dMn_nM | dissolved manganese | nanomolar |
dMn_nM_flag | flag for dissolved manganese: ND = below detection limit | unitless |
Siderophores_pM | siderophore concentration | picomolar |
Siderophores_pM_flag | flag for siderophore concentration: ND = below detection limit | unitless |
Free_Fe_pM | inorganic dissolved Fe | picomolar |
error_Free_Fe_pM | 95% confidence interval of inorganic Fe | picomolar |
L_nM | organic iron-binding ligand concentration, ND is below detection limit | nanomolar |
error_L_nM | 95% confidence interval of orgnaic Fe binding ligands | nanomolar |
logK | conditional stability constant of Fe-binding ligands, ND is below detection limit | unitless |
error_logK | 95% confidence interval of orgnaic Fe binding ligand condtional stability constant | unitless |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | CTD profiler (Seabird Scientific) |
Generic Instrument Name | CTD - profiler |
Generic Instrument Description | The Conductivity, Temperature, Depth (CTD) unit is an integrated instrument package designed to measure the conductivity, temperature, and pressure (depth) of the water column. The instrument is lowered via cable through the water column. It permits scientists to observe the physical properties in real-time via a conducting cable, which is typically connected to a CTD to a deck unit and computer on a ship. The CTD is often configured with additional optional sensors including fluorometers, transmissometers and/or radiometers. It is often combined with a Rosette of water sampling bottles (e.g. Niskin, GO-FLO) for collecting discrete water samples during the cast.
This term applies to profiling CTDs. For fixed CTDs, see https://www.bco-dmo.org/instrument/869934. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Roger Revelle |
Start Date | 2021-09-18 |
End Date | 2021-11-06 |
NSF Award Abstract:
Hydrothermal vents are hot springs on the seafloor. They are often thousands of meters below the surface of the ocean along the large volcanic mountain ranges called the mid-ocean ridges. Relatively little is known about these hydrothermal vents because they exist so far from the ocean surface. Instead of lava, these vents emit warm to hot fluids (from several ºC up to 350 ºC) into the ocean, and contain high concentrations of a wide range of dissolved chemicals. One of these chemicals, iron, has been studied extensively by ocean scientists because of its importance as an essential nutrient for the microscopic photosynthetic algae called phytoplankton that grow in surface ocean waters. Scientists once thought that most of the dissolved iron coming out of hydrothermal vent fluids would quickly precipitate (form a solid and sink) near the vents, as a result of chemical reactions between the hot vent fluid and cold seawater, and therefore only small amounts of dissolved iron could be transported from the deep sea mid-ocean ridges to surface waters where phytoplankton grow. However, on a recent scientific expedition over one of the most active mid-ocean ridges called the southern East Pacific Rise (SEPR), scientists discovered that much of the dissolved iron discharged from the SEPR hydrothermal vents was in fact transported thousands of kilometers across the deep ocean. In addition, computer simulations suggest that a substantial amount of this 'hydrothermal iron' is transported as far as the surface waters of the Southern Ocean around Antarctica, where it could support the growth of phytoplankton.
Scientists from the University of Washington, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Old Dominion University will return to the SEPR aboard a research ship and make additional measurements to better understand how hydrothermal vents add dissolved iron to the deep ocean. They will use specialized sampling equipment, including unmanned miniature submarines called autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), to map the distribution of hydrothermal vents in this region, and collect water samples from both high temperature (250-350 ºC) and low temperature (< 150 ºC) vents. These samples will be analyzed for chemicals that are enriched in the hydrothermal vent fluids, such as iron, manganese and helium-3, which will provide information on the chemical changes that occur as the hydrothermal vent fluids mix with surrounding seawater and are carried away from the SEPR. The scientists will use their observations and chemical analyses to address the following major questions: 1) are there more hydrothermal vents along mid ocean ridges than previously thought? and (2) are low temperature hydrothermal vents especially favorable for stabilizing dissolved iron, and ultimately transporting it to the surface ocean where it supports phytoplankton growth?
The project will contribute to the education and training of a graduate student and two senior undergraduate students, and outcomes will be incorporated into high school STEM curricula. The research activities will be communicated via public lectures and media releases, and project results will be disseminated to the scientific community by conference presentations, publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and freely available on-line archived data.
Along thousands of kilometers of the seafloor volcanic chains known as the mid-ocean ridges, hydrothermal vents discharge hot, acidic, metal-rich fluids into the deep ocean. These submarine hot springs are a major gateway for the exchange of heat and chemicals between the solid earth and the deep ocean, and have received intensive scientific study during the last 40 years. This research has overwhelmingly focused on high temperature (~200-350°C) hydrothermal vents. Lower temperature (<150°C) hydrothermal venting has received relatively little attention, although results from recent observational and modeling studies point to the greater abundance of low temperature discharge along the mid-ocean ridges, and its potential importance for the input of elements and chemical compounds into the deep ocean. Among the elements that are enriched in hydrothermal vent fluids, iron has received attention because of its role as an essential nutrient for primary production in the surface ocean. It has long been thought that most of the dissolved iron discharged by hydrothermal vents is lost from solution close to mid-ocean ridge sources, and thus of limited importance for ocean chemistry. But this view has been challenged by recent studies which suggest that chemical stabilization of hydrothermal dissolved iron may facilitate its long-range transport in the deep ocean. In particular, results from the US GEOTRACES program have revealed the lateral transport of a plume of hydrothermal dissolved iron over several thousand kilometers westward from its source region on the southern East Pacific Rise (SEPR).
In this project, investigators from the University of Washington, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Old Dominion University will carry out a field research program on the SEPR to test the overarching hypothesis that diffuse low-temperature hydrothermal venting is a major a source of chemically-stabilized dissolved iron to the deep ocean, and hence plays an important but previously overlooked role in the ocean iron cycle. The ship-based field program will use an autonomous underwater vehicle equipped with in-situ optical and chemical sensors to identify plumes of both diffuse (low-temperature) and discrete (high-temperature) hydrothermal discharge along the SEPR. Emissions from multiple sites of both low and high temperature hydrothermal venting will be sampled for shipboard and post-cruise analyses of iron and other trace metals, and the inert hydrothermal "tracer" helium-3. The resulting data will be used to test two specific hypotheses: (1) the population of active hydrothermal discharge sites along mid ocean ridges is greater than previously estimated, (2) low temperature hydrothermal venting is conducive to the chemical stabilization of dissolved iron, thus facilitating its export to the ocean interior and ultimately to surface ocean where it supports primary production by phytoplankton. The information obtained in this research will facilitate inclusion of iron and other trace elements in numerical models of ocean biology and biogeochemistry, which will improve the ability to predict how the ocean will respond to and modulate future climatic and environmental changes.
This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |