Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Lenz, Petra H. | University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa | Principal Investigator |
Block, Lauren N | University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa | Scientist, Student |
York, Amber D. | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Microzooplankton samples were collected at 3 depths (50, 150, and 280 m) by gently draining 250 mL of seawater from the Niskin bottle with a silicon tube to avoid bubbling. Samples were then preserved with acid Lugol’s solution to a final concentration of 5% (Strom et al., 2019). Glass was added to saturate silica and prevent dissolution of diatoms. Samples were gently mixed and 100 mL subsamples were settled onto microscope slides. Diatoms, dinoflagellates, and ciliates were identified to lowest taxonomic classification, enumerated, and imaged under an inverted microscope. Linear length and widths of cells were measured for a subset of 5 cells (or maximum number) per sample per taxon using ImageJ. Biovolume was estimated using the median linear measurements per taxon and biovolume was calculated using the volumetric equations most closely matching the cell shape (Hillebrand et al., 1999). Biovolume was then converted to carbon biomass according to established diatom and protist carbon:volume relationships (Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000).
Day-trips aboard the R/V Nanuq conducted approximately biweekly in Resurrection Bay, AK during January to March, 2023.
For the microscopy, biovolume was estimated using the median linear measurements per taxon and biovolume was calculated using the volumetric equations most closely matching the cell shape (Hillebrand et al., 1999). Biovolume was then converted to carbon biomass according to established diatom and protist carbon:volume relationships (Menden-Deuer and Lessard, 2000).
* Sheet 1 of submitted file "Sheet 1-1-NaupProj2023_Lugols_BCODMO.csv" was imported into the BCO-DMO data system for this dataset. Table will appear as Data File: 954189_v1_microplankton-microscopy.csv (along with other download format options).
* A unique list of taxonomic names used in the data table was matched with identifiers using the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS, marinspecies.org) taxa match tool on 2025-02-24. The resulting species list was attached as a supplemental file.
* "Tintinnid" was matched to "Tintinnidae" the formal taxon representation of the name. urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:183533
* The incorrect phonetic spelling of "Dytilum" was corrected to "Ditylum" (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:149022) in the data table and subsequent supplemental file.
* "Navicula" and "Nitzschia" returned ambiguous name match results however, each only had one matching result that was a diatom as described by the column "group" to the appropriate LSIDs could be assigned in this dataset. The other possible matches were in Mollusca and Platyhelminthes.
File |
---|
954189_v1_microplankton-microscopy.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 26.74 KB) MD5:f05d0c4a60eb8179566bcf7f1eceb7bf Primary data file for dataset ID 954189, version 1 |
File |
---|
Species List with Taxonomic Identifiers filename: species_list.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 1.75 KB) MD5:ee474b635979a057045647c50ff41b01 Species list for unique taxa in this dataset. Names were matched using the World Register of Marine Species on 2025-02-24 and all names matched exactly to accepted names at that time. Columns: group, Group as defined in the "group" column of the primary data table 954189_v1_microplankton-microscopy.csv taxa_in_dataset, Taxonomic name for the organism as used in the "taxa" column of 954189_v1_microplankton-microscopy.csv ScientificName, Matched accepted taxonomic name for the "taxa_in_dataset". AphiaID, World Register of Marine Species identifier (AphiaID) for the ScientificName LSID, Life Science Identifier (LSID) for the ScientificName |
Parameter | Description | Units |
cruise | Cruise ID | unitless |
date | Date (Local time) in ISO 8601 format yyyy-mm-dd | unitless |
station | Station ID | unitless |
latitude | Station latitude, north is positive | Decimal Degrees North |
longitude | Station latitude, west is negative | Decimal Degrees East |
depth | Target water collection depth | Meters (m) |
sample_volume | Volume of sample processed for microscopy | Milliliters (ml) |
group | Broad taxonomic grouping (Diatom, Dinoflagellate, Cilliate) | unitless |
taxa | Taxonomic identification to lowest taxonomic level | unitless |
cell_count | Number of cells observed in the sample | Integer |
abundance | Number of cells per ml of sample per taxa | Cells per milliliter (#/ml) |
cell_biovolume | Estimated biovolume per cell | Cubic micrometers (µg^3) |
cell_carbon | Estimated carbon per cell based on biovolume estimate | Picograms carbon (pg) |
biomass | Biomass per mL of sample per taxa | Picograms carbon per milliliter (pg/ml) |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | |
Generic Instrument Name | CTD - profiler |
Dataset-specific Description | SBE55 rosette with 6 4-L Niskin Bottles |
Generic Instrument Description | The Conductivity, Temperature, Depth (CTD) unit is an integrated instrument package designed to measure the conductivity, temperature, and pressure (depth) of the water column. The instrument is lowered via cable through the water column. It permits scientists to observe the physical properties in real-time via a conducting cable, which is typically connected to a CTD to a deck unit and computer on a ship. The CTD is often configured with additional optional sensors including fluorometers, transmissometers and/or radiometers. It is often combined with a Rosette of water sampling bottles (e.g. Niskin, GO-FLO) for collecting discrete water samples during the cast.
This term applies to profiling CTDs. For fixed CTDs, see https://www.bco-dmo.org/instrument/869934. |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Inverted microscope (Olympus IM) |
Generic Instrument Name | Inverted Microscope |
Generic Instrument Description | An inverted microscope is a microscope with its light source and condenser on the top, above the stage pointing down, while the objectives and turret are below the stage pointing up. It was invented in 1850 by J. Lawrence Smith, a faculty member of Tulane University (then named the Medical College of Louisiana).
Inverted microscopes are useful for observing living cells or organisms at the bottom of a large container (e.g. a tissue culture flask) under more natural conditions than on a glass slide, as is the case with a conventional microscope. Inverted microscopes are also used in micromanipulation applications where space above the specimen is required for manipulator mechanisms and the microtools they hold, and in metallurgical applications where polished samples can be placed on top of the stage and viewed from underneath using reflecting objectives.
The stage on an inverted microscope is usually fixed, and focus is adjusted by moving the objective lens along a vertical axis to bring it closer to or further from the specimen. The focus mechanism typically has a dual concentric knob for coarse and fine adjustment. Depending on the size of the microscope, four to six objective lenses of different magnifications may be fitted to a rotating turret known as a nosepiece. These microscopes may also be fitted with accessories for fitting still and video cameras, fluorescence illumination, confocal scanning and many other applications. |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | |
Generic Instrument Name | Niskin bottle |
Generic Instrument Description | A Niskin bottle (a next generation water sampler based on the Nansen bottle) is a cylindrical, non-metallic water collection device with stoppers at both ends. The bottles can be attached individually on a hydrowire or deployed in 12, 24, or 36 bottle Rosette systems mounted on a frame and combined with a CTD. Niskin bottles are used to collect discrete water samples for a range of measurements including pigments, nutrients, plankton, etc. |
NSF Award Abstract
Global climate change and associated extreme weather events are increasingly impacting marine communities at all trophic levels and leading to shifts in the timing of life history events. This project is investigating the annual restart of the spring zooplankton community in the Gulf of Alaska in order to determine the timing of species-specific recruitment and growth. Zooplankton are small pelagic animals that are a critical link between microalgae and protozoans and higher levels in the food web including economically important fishes, birds and marine mammals. While their abundances and species composition have been documented over part of the annual cycle between late spring and fall, this project focuses on winter and early spring. The project integrates traditional methods with modern molecular approaches to characterize the diversity, development, feeding and physiology of zooplankton, especially the early developmental stages of copepods (small crustaceans). The goal is to determine which species are there, how many are present and where they are in the water column, and to reveal indicators of their health. Broader impacts include research training for three graduate students and at least four undergraduates in biological oceanography and physiological ecology. Outreach activities are focusing on broadening the public’s understanding of plankton ecology. An illustrated zooplankton guide for the Gulf of Alaska and plankton module for school teachers and students is being produced in collaboration with the Center for Alaskan Coastal Studies. Other plans include sponsorship of nature-drawing workshops on zooplankton and the production of an Art & Science traveling exhibit.
This project is tracking zooplankton population abundances, species composition and developmental stages through the spring restart in a high-latitude fjord in the northern Gulf of Alaska. While the entire zooplankton community is being characterized, the main focus is on the difficult-to-assess early developmental stages of copepods, which dominate the late spring biomass in the region. Three central hypotheses guide the research: 1) high abundances of copepod nauplii are present before any measurable increases in food in surface waters; 2) species diversity increases between winter and spring, with nauplii from large lipid-rich capital-breeding species appearing first, followed by those from income- and hybrid-strategy species and finally nauplii that emerge from dormant eggs; 3) prior to the appearance of food resources, nauplii from capital-breeding species conserve resources by delaying development and entering a state of dormancy in the second and third naupliar stages. The project entails intensive depth-stratified field sampling to characterize the wild community, in combination with laboratory experiments on nauplii to determine their responsiveness to food. The prey are being characterized by measuring chlorophyll a, dietary and prey community DNA sequencing and flow cytometry to establish diversity and abundances. Size-fractionated zooplankton samples are being analyzed using microscopy and community DNA sequencing to ascertain species diversity, developmental stage distribution and abundances. Feeding activity is being measured using dietary DNA sequencing of nauplii followed by comparisons with the prey field. Dormancy in nauplii is being determined by differential gene expression of target genes (RT-qPCR) and high-throughput sequencing of mRNA of individuals (transcriptomics) and community samples (meta-transcriptomics). Short-term and long-term effects of food availability on dormancy, development and growth are being quantified in laboratory experiments. Broader impacts are focused on training of students in interdisciplinary research and state-of-art techniques, and public outreach to introduce plankton ecology to broader audiences.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Office of Polar Programs (formerly NSF PLR) (NSF OPP) | |
NSF Office of Polar Programs (formerly NSF PLR) (NSF OPP) | |
NSF Office of Polar Programs (formerly NSF PLR) (NSF OPP) |